Список трудов авторов, использованных при подготовке статей по УЗИ в урологии на сайте МедикалПланет

Сокращения применяемые в статьях:

  1. ДГПЖ — доброкачественная гиперплазия предстательной железы
  2. КДС — конечно-диастолическая скорость
  3. КТ — компьютерная томография
  4. МРТ — магнитно-резонансная томография
  5. ОПТ — отрицательный предсказательный тест
  6. ППТ — положительный предсказательный тест
  7. ПРИ — пальцевое ректальное исследование
  8. ПСА — простатоспецифический антиген
  9. ПСС — пиковая систолическая скорость
  10. РИ — резистивный индекс
  11. ТРУЗИ — трансректальное ультразвуковое исследование
  12. УЗИ — ультразвуковое исследование
  13. ФСГ — фолликулостимулирующий гормон
  14. ЭД — эректильная дисфункция
  15. FDA — Федеральная служба США по контролю над качеством препаратов и пищевых добавок (от Food and Drug Administration)
  16. HIFU — высокоинтенсивный сфокусированный ультразвук (от High Intensity Focused Ultrasound)
  17. PCA — антиген рака предстательной железы (от Prostate cancer antigen)
  18. TART — образование в яичках из остаточной надпочечниковой ткани (от Testicular adrenal rest tumours)

При подготовке статей по УЗИ в урологии на сайте МедикалПланет использованы труды исключительно признанных зарубежных авторов:

  1. Goodwin W.E., Casey W.C., Woolf W. Trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis // JAMA. 1955. Vol. 157. P. 891-894.
  2. GuZ., Qi J., ShenH., Liu J., Chen J. Percutaneous nephroscopic with holmium laser and ultrasound lithotripsy for complicated renal calculi // Lasers Med. Sci. 2010. Vol. 25. P. 577-580.
  3. GuptaS., Gulati M., Uday Shankar K. et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy with real-time sonographic guidance // Acta Radiol. 1997. Vol. 38. P. 454-457.
  4. Bird V.G., Fallon B„ Winfield H.N. Practice patterns in the treatment of large renal stones//J. Endourol. 2003. Vol. 17. P. 355-361.
  5. Skolarikos A., Alivizatos G., Papatsoris A. et al. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy performed by urologists: 10-year experience // Urology. 2006. Vol. 68. P. 495—499.
  6. Aiken P., HutschenreiterG., Gunther R. Percutaneous kidney stone removal // Eur. Urol. 1982. Vol. 8. P. 304-311.
  7. Miano R., Scoflbne C., De Nunzio C., German! S. et al. Position: prone or supine is the issue of percutaneous nephrolithotomy // J. Endourol. 2010. Vol. 24. P. 931-938.
  8. Wah T. Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteric stenting // Controversies and Consensus in Imaging and Intervention. 2005. Vol. 3. P. 20—22. (Feb 2012).
  9. El-Nahas A.R., Shokeir A.A., El-Assmy A.M., ShomaA.M. et al. Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factors // Urology. 2006. Vol. 67, N 5. P. 937-941.
  10. Basiri A., Ziaee A., Kianian H. et al. Ultrasonographic versus fluoroscopic access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized clinical trial // J. Endourol. 2008. Vol. 22. P. 281-284.
  11. Radecka E., Magnusson A. Complications associated with percutaneous nephrostomies: a retrospective study // Acta Radiol. 2004. Vol. 45. P. 184-188.
  12. von der Recke P., Nielsen M.B., Pedersen J.F. Complications of ultrasound guided nephrostomy: a 5-year experience // Acta Radiol. 1994. Vol. 35. P. 452-454.
  13. Lewis S., Patel U. Major complications after percutaneous nephrostomy — lessons from a departmental audit // Clin. Radiol. 2004. Vol. 59. P. 171-179.
  14. Torres MucozA., Valdez-Ortiz R., Gonz61ez-Parra C., Espinoza-D6vila E. et al. Percutaneous renal biopsy of native kidneys: efficiency, safety and risk factors associated with major complications // Arch. Med. Sci. 2011. Vol. 7. P. 823-831.
  15. FerganyA.F., Hafez K.S., Novick A.C. Longterm results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow-up // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 442-445.
  16. Lau W.K., Blute M.L., Weaver A.L., Torres V.E. et al. Matched comparison of radical nephrectomy vs nephron-sparing surgery in patients with unilateral renal cell carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2000. Vol. 75. P. 1236-1242.
  17. Huang W.C., Levey A.S., Serio A.M., Snyder M. et al. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study // Lancet Oncol. 2006. Vol. 7. P. 735-740.
  18. LeeC.T., Katz J., ShiW., Thaler H.T. et al. Surgical management of renal tumors 4cm or less in a contemporary cohort // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 730-736.
  19. Baust J.G., GageA.A., Clarke D. et al. Cryosurgery — a putative approach to molecularbased optimization // Cryobiology. 2004. Vol. 48. P. 190-204.
  20. Baust J.G., GageA.A. The molecular basis of cryosurgery // BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 95. P. 1187-1191.
  21. Curry N.S., BissadaN.K. Radiologic evaluation of small and indeterminant renal masses // Urol. Clin. North Am. 1997. Vol. 24. P. 493-505.
  22. OnikG., Reyes G., Cohen J., Porterfield B. Ultrasound characteristics of renal cryosurgery// Urology. 1993. Vol. 42. P. 212—215.
  23. Lockhart M.E., Smith J.K., Kenney P.J. Imaging of adrenal masses // Eur. J. Radiol. 2002. Vol. 41, N 2. P. 95-112.
  24. Hijioka S., Sawaki A., Mizuno N., Hara K. et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography (CE-EUS) findings in adrenal metastasis from renal cell carcinoma // J. Med. Ultrason. 2011. Vol. 38. P. 89-92.
  25. Bang H.J., Littrup P.J., Goodrich D.J., Currier B.P. et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of metastatic renal cell carcinoma for local tumor control: feasibility, outcomes, and estimated cost-effectiveness for palliation // J. Vase. Interv. Radiol. 2012. Vol. 23. P. 770— 777.
  26. Rosenstein D., McAninch J.W. Urologic emergencies// Med. Clin. North Am. 2004. Vol. 88. P. 495-518.
  27. Borrelli J., Brandes S.B. Pelvic fractures: assessment and management for the urologist // AUA Update Series. 2004. Vol. 23. P. 82-86.
  28. OzkanB., KayaO., AkdaR., Unal O. et al. Suprapubic bladder aspiration with or without ultrasound guidance // Clin. Pediatr. (Phila). 2000. Vol. 39, N 10. P. 625-626.
  29. MianoR., Kim F.J., De Nunzio C., Mauri-ello A. et al. Morphological evaluation of the male external urethral sphincter complex by transrectal ultrasound: feasibility study and potential clinical applications // Urol. Int. 2012. Vol. 89, N 3. P. 275-282.
  30. Coppola R. Diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by means of transperineal needle biopsy // Riforma Med. 1963. Vol. 77. P. 1282-1284.
  31. Igel T.C., Knight M.K., Young P.R. et al. Systematic transperineal ultrasound guided template biopsy of the prostate in patients at high risk//J. Urol. 2001. Vol. 165. P. 1575-1579.
  32. Crawford E.D., Wilson S.S., Torkko K.C. et al. Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy// BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 96. P. 999-1004.
  33. GonderM.J., Soanes W.A., Smith V. Experimental prostate cryosurgery // Invest. Urol. 1964. Vol. 14. P. 610-619.
  34. Onik G., Cobb C., Cohen J. et al. US characteristics of frozen prostate // Radiology. 1988. Vol. 168. P. 629-631.
  35. Littrup P., Monti J., Mody A. et al. Prostatic cryotherapy: ultrasonic and pathologic correlation in the canine model // Urology. 1994. Vol. 44. P. 175-184.
  36. Scardino P., Carlton C. Combined interstitial and external irradiation for prostatic cancer // Principles and Management of Urologic Cancer J ed. N. Javadpour. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1983. P. 392-408.
  37. Whitmore Jr W.F., Hilaris B., Grabstald H. Retropubic implantation to iodine 125 in the treatment of prostatic cancer // J. Urol. 1972. Vol. 108. P. 918-920.
  38. DeLaney T.F., Shipley W.U., O’Leary M.P., Biggs P.J. et al. Preoperative irradiation, lymphadenectomy, and 125iodine implantation for patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1986. Vol. 12. P. 1779-1785.
  39. Aronowitz J.N. Dawn of prostate brachytherapy: 1915—1930 // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2002. Vol. 54. P. 712-718.
  40. Holm H.H., Juul N., Pedersen J.E, Hansen H. et al. Transperineal Iodine-125 seed implantation in prostatic cancer guided by transrectal ultrasonography // J. Urol. 1983. Vol. 130. P. 283-286.
  41. Ho A., Burri R., CesarettiJ. et al. Radiation dose predicts for biochemical control in intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009. Vol. 75. P. 16-22.
  42. Potters L., Roach 111 M., Davis B. et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 9-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after permanent prostate brachytherapy using radiation dose as a prognostic variable // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010. Vol. 76. P. 1061-1065.
  43. Hinnen K.A., Jan J.B., van Roermund J.G. et al. Longterm biochemical and survival outcome of 921 patients treated with 1-125 permanent prostate brachytherapy // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2009. Vol. 76. P. 1433-1438.
  44. Nag S., Ciezki J.P., Cormack R. et al. Intraoperative planning and evaluation of permanent prostate brachytherapy: report of the American Brachytherapy Society // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2001. Vol. 51. P. 1422-1430.
  45. Han B.H., WallnerK., Merrick G., Butler W. et al. Prostate brachytherapy seed identification on post-implant TRUS images // Med. Phys. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 898-900.
  46. Rove K.O., Sullivan K., Crawford E.D. High-intensity focused ultrasound: ready for primetime // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2010. Vol. 37. P. 27-35.
  47. Gelet A., Chapelon J.Y., Bouvier R. et al. Local control of prostate cancer by transrectal HIFU therapy: preliminary results // J. Urol. 1999. Vol. 161. P. 156-162.
  48. Warwick R., Pond J. Trackless lesions in nervous tissues produced by high intensity focused ultrasound (high-frequency mechanical waves)//J. Anat. 1968. Vol. 102. P. 387-405.
  49. Chaussy C., ThuroffS. The status of high-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of localized prostate cancer and the impact of a combined resection // Curr. Urol. Rep. 2003. Vol. 4. P. 248-252.
  50. Dewhirst M.W., Viglianti B.L., Lora-Michiels M. et al. Basic principles of thermal dosimetry and thermal thresholds for tissue damage from hyperthermia // Int. J. Hyperthermia. 2003. Vol. 19. P. 267-294.
  51. Ukimura O., Gill I.S., Desai M.M. et al. Realtime transrectal ultrasonography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy //J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 172, P. 112-118.
  52. Zuniga A., Lawrentschuk N., Jewett M.A. Organsparing approaches for testicular masses // Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010. Vol. 7. P. 454-464.
  53. Cormier C.M., Canzoneri B.J., Lewis D.F. et al. Urolithiasis in pregnancy: current diagnosis, treatment, and pregnancy complications // Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2006. Vol. 61. P. 733-741.
  54. Andreoiu M., Macmahon R. Renal colic in pregnancy: lithiasis or physiological hydronephrosis? // Urology. 2009. Vol. 74. P. 757—761.
  55. Loughlin K. R., Kerr L.A. The current management of urolithiasis during pregnancy // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2002. Vol. 29. P. 701-704.
  56. Schaeffer A.J.,Schaeffer Е.М. Infections of the urinarytract // Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 1. 10th ed. I eds L. Kavoussi, A. Novick, A. Partin, C. Peters. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; Saunders, 2011. P. 257—326.
  57. Coe F.L., Parks J.H., Lindhemer M.D. Nephrolithiasis during pregnancy // N. Engl. J. Med. 1978. Vol. 298. P. 324-326.
  58. Pearle M., LotanY. Urinary lithiasis: etiology, epidemiology, and pathogenesis // Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 2. 10th ed. J eds L. Kavoussi, A. Novick, A. Partin, C. Peters. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; Saunders, 2011. P. 1257—86.
  59. Ferrandino M., Pietrow P., Preminger G. Evaluation and medical management of urinary lithiasis // Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 2. 10th ed. J eds L. Kavoussi, A. Novick, A. Partin, C. Peters. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; Saunders, 2011. P. 1287—323.
  60. Fulgham P., Bishoff J. Urinarytract imaging: basic principles // Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 1. 10th ed. I eds L. Kavoussi, A. Novick, A. Partin, C. Peters. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; Saunders, 2011. P. 99—139.
  61. Fried A.M., Woodring J.H., Thompson D.J. Hydronephrosis of pregnancy: a prospective sequential study of the course of dilation // J. Ultrasound Med. 1983. Vol. 2, N 6. P. 255-259.
  62. Rasmussen P.E., Nielsen F.R. Hydronephrosis during pregnancy: a literature survey // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 1988. Vol. 27, N 3. P. 249-252.
  63. Schulman A., HerlingerH. Urinary tract dilation in pregnancy // Br. J. Radiol. 1975. Vol. 48. P. 638-645.
  64. MacNeily A.E., Goldenberg S.L., Allen G.J. et al. Sonographic visualization of the ureter in pregnancy // J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 146. P. 298— 301.
  65. ParkS.J., Yi B.H., Lee H.K. et al. Evaluation of patients with suspected ureteral calculi using sonography as an initial diagnostic tool // J. Ultrasound Med. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 1441— 1450.
  66. Singhl., Strandhoy J.W., Assimos D.G. Pathophysiology of urinary tract obstruction // Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. / ed. A.J. Wein. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; Saunders, 2011. P. 1087-121.
  67. Peake S.L., Roxburgh H.B., Langlois S.L. Ultrasonic assessment of hydronephrosis of pregnancy // Radiology. 1983. Vol. 146. P. 167— 170.
  68. Nyholm J.L., Brost B.C., Watson W.J. Maternal hydration status affects pelvic calyceal diameter in pregnancy //Am. J. Perinatal. 2008. Vol. 25, N3. P. 157-159.
  69. Ellenbogen P.H., Scheible F.W., TainerL.B. et al. Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1978. Vol. 130. P. 731-733.
  70. Boridyl., MakladN., Sandler C. Suspected urolithiasis in pregnant women: Imaging algorithm and literature review // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1996. Vol. 167. P. 869-875.
  71. Deyoe L.A., Cronan J.J., BreslawB.H. et al. New techniques of ultrasound and color Doppler in the prospective evaluation of acute renal obstruction: Do they replace the intravenous urogram? // Abdom. Imaging. 1995. Vol. 20. P. 58-63.
  72. Tublin M.E., Dodd G.E., VerdileV.P. Acute renal colic: diagnosis with duplex Doppler ultrasound // Radiology. 1994. Vol. 193. P. 697— 701.
  73. Platt J.F., Rubin J.M., Ellis J.H . et al. Distinction between obstructive and non obstructive pyelocaliectasis with duplex Doppler sonography 11 AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1989. Vol. 153. P. 997-1000.
  74. Calenoff L., Lin P.J., WardW.F. Radiology in obstetrical practice // Obstetric Practice / ed. A. Silvio. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby, 1980. P. 242.
  75. Hill M.C., Rich J.I., MardiatJ.G., Finder C.A. Sonography vs excretory urography in acute flank pain // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1985. Vol. 144. P. 1235-1238.
  76. ShokeirA.A., Abdulmaaboud M. Prospective comparison of nonenhanced helical computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of renal colic // J. Urol. 2001. Vol. 165. P. 1082-1084.
  77. Olin J.W., Piedmonte M.R., Young J.R. et al. The utility of duplex ultrasound scanning of the renal arteries for diagnosing significant renal artery stenosis // Ann. Intern. Med. 1995. Vol. 122. P. 833-838.
  78. Tublin M.E., Buda R.O., Platt J.I. The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? / /AJR Am. J. Radiol. 2003. Vol. 180. P. 885-892.
  79. Hertzberg B.S., Carroll B.A., Bowie J.P. et al. Doppler US assessment of maternal kidneys: analysis of intrarenal resistivity indexes in normal pregnancy and physiologic pelvicaliectasis // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1993. Vol. 186. P. 689-692.
  80. Soria Golvez F. Usefulness of renal resistive index in the diagnosis and evolution of the obstructive uropathy. Experimental study //Actas Urol. Esp. 2007. Vol. 31, N 1. P. 38-42.
  81. Shokeir A.A. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 55, N 3. P. 344-347.
  82. Renowden S.A., Cochlin D.C. The effect of intravenous furosemide on Doppler wave form in normal kidneys // J. Ultrasound Med. 1992. Vol. 11. P. 65.
  83. Shokeir A.A., Provost A.P., El Azab M. et al. Renal Doppler ultrasound in children with obstructive uropathy: effect of intravenous normal saline fluid load and furosemide // J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 156. P. 1455.
  84. Farmakides G., Schulmand H., Schneider E. Surveillance of pregnant hypertensive patient with Doppler flow velocimetry // Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1992. Vol. 35. P. 387-394.
  85. MallekR., BankierA.A., Etele-Hainz A. et al. Distinction between obstructive and non obstructive hydronephrosis: value of diuresis duplex Doppler sonography // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1996. Vol. 166. P. 113-117.
  86. Jerde T.J., Calamon-Dixon J.L., Bjorling D.E. et al. Celecoxib inhibits ureteral contractility and prostanoid release // Urology. 2005. Vol. 65. P. 185-190.
  87. Pozniak M.A., KelczF., StrattaR.J., Oberley T.D. Extraneous factors affecting resistive index // Invest. Radiol. 1988. Vol. 23. P. 899— 904.
  88. SjodinJ.G. Clinical experience of indomethacin in pain from ureteral stone // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1983. Vol. 75. P. 35-36.
  89. N’Guyen Tand Lung R., Cirarci-Vigneron N., Rabbe A. et al. Interet de 1’echographie du rein maternel pendant la grassesse // Ann. Radiol. (Paris). 1986. Vol. 20. P. 381-383.
  90. Grenier N.L., Parient J.L., Trillaud H. et al. Dilatation of the collecting system during pregnancy: physiologic vs obstructive dilatation // Eur. Radiol. 2000. Vol. 10, N 2. P. 271-279.
  91. Faudes A., Bricola-Rilho M., Pinto E. et al. Dilatation of urinary tract during pregnancy: proposal of a curve of maximal caliceal diameter by gestational age // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1998. Vol. 178. P. 1082-1088.
  92. Burge H.L., Middleton W.B., McClennan B.L. et al. Ureteral jets in healthy patients and in patients with unilateral ureteral calculi: comparison with color Doppler ultrasound // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1991. Vol. 180. P. 437-442.
  93. Cox I.H., Erickson S.J., Foley W.D. et al. Ureteral jets: evaluation of normal flow dynamics with color Doppler sonography // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992. Vol. 158. P. 1051-1055.
  94. Baker S.M., Middleton W.D. Color Doppler sonography of ureteral jets in normal volunteers: Importance of the relative specific gravity of urine in the ureter and bladder // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1992. Vol. 159. P. 773— 775.
  95. Dubbins P.A., Kurtz A.B., Darby J., Goldberg B. Ureteric jet effect: the echographic appearance of urine entering the bladder // AJ R Am. J. Radiol. 1981. Vol. 140. P. 513-515.
  96. Delair S.M., Kurzrock E.A. Clinical utility of ureteral jets: disparate opinions // J. Endourol. 2006. Vol. 20, N 2. P. 111-114.
  97. Laing F.C., Benson C.B., DiSalvo D.N. et al. Distal ureteral calculi: detection with vaginal ultrasound //AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1994. Vol. 192. P. 545-548.
  98. Damani N., Wilson S.R. Non gynecologic application of transvaginal US // Radiographics. 1999. Vol. 19. P. S179-S200.
  99. Lee J.Y., Kim S.H., Cho J.Y. et al. Color and power Doppler twinkling artifacts from urinary stones: clinical observation and phantom studies // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1992. Vol. 159. P. 773-775.
  100. KarabulutN., KarabulutA. Color Doppler evaluation of ureteral jets in normal second and third trimester pregnancy: Effect of patient position// Br. J. Radiol. 2002. Vol. 75, N 892. P. 351-355.
  101. Swartz H.M., Reichling B.A. Hazards of radiation exposure for pregnant women // JAMA. 1978. Vol. 239. P. 1907-1908.
  102. Dudd III G.D., Tublin M.E., Shah A. et al. Imaging vascular complications associated with renal transplants // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1991. Vol. 157. P. 449-459.
  103. Schwaighafer B., Kainberger F., Fruehwald E et al. Duplex sonography of normal renal allografts //Acta Radiol. 1989. Vol. 30. P. 53.
  104. Braun B., Weilemann L.S., Weigand W. Ultrasonographic demonstration of renal vein thrombosis // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1989. Vol. 138. P. 157-158.
  105. Kaveggia L.P., Parrella R.R., Grant E.G. et al. Duplex Doppler sonography in renal allograph: the significance of reversed flow in diastole // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1990. Vol. 155. P. 295-298.
  106. Reuther G., Wanjura D., Bauer H. Acute renal vein thrombosis in renal allografts: detection with duplex Doppler ultrasound // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1989. Vol. 170. P. 557-558.
  107. Kohler T.R., ZierlerR.E., Martin R.L. et al. Non invasive diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by ultrasonic duplex scanning // Vase. Surg. 1986. Vol. 4. P. 450-456.
  108. Gottlieb R.H., Lieberman J.L., Paico R.C. et al. Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis in transplanted kidneys: value of Doppler waveform analysis of the intrarenal arteries // AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1995. Vol. 165. P. 1441-1446.
  109. Nazzal M.M., Hoballah J.J., Miller E.V. et al. Renal hilar Doppler analysis is of value in the management of patients with renovascular disease//Am. J. Surg. 1997. Vol. 174. P. 164-188.
  110. House M.K., Dowling R.J., King P. Using Doppler sonography to reveal renal artery stenosis. An evaluation of optimal imaging parameters //AJR Am. J. Radiol. 1999. Vol. 173. P. 761-765.
  111. Giorgi Jr L.J., Bratslavsky G., Kogan B.A. Febrile urinary tract infections in infants: renal ultrasound remains necessary // J. Urol. 2005. Vol. 173, N 2. P. 568-570.
  112. Li-Ing B. et al. Bladder shape impact on the accuracy of ultrasonic estimation of bladder volume // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 1998. Vol. 79. P. 1553-1556.
  113. Rosenbaum D.M., Korngold E., Teele R.L. Sonographic assessment of renal length in normal children // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1984. Vol. 142, N 3. P. 467-469.
  114. Krill A., SalamiS., Rosen L., Friedman S.C. et al. Evaluating compensatory hypertrophy: a growth curve specific for solitary functioning kidneys // J. Urol. 2012. Vol. 188, N 4. Suppl. P. 1613-1617.
  115. Cascio S., Paran S., Puri P. Associated urological anomalies in children with unilateral renal agenesis // J. Urol. 1999. Vol. 162, N 3. Pt 2. P. 1081-1083.
  116. Damen-Elias H.A., Stoutenbeek P.H., Visser G.H., Nikkels P.G. et al. Concomitant anomalies in 100 children with unilateral multicystic kidney // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 25, N 4. P. 384-388.
  117. Mandell J., Blyth B.R., Peters C.A., Retik A.B. et al. Structural genitourinary defects detected in utero // Radiology. 1991. Vol. 178, N 1. P. 193-196.
  118. Ismaili K., Hall M., Donner C., Thomas D. et al. Brussels Free University Perinatal Nephrology study group. Results of systematic screening for minor degrees of fetal renal pelvis dilatation in an unselected population // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2003. Vol. 188, N 1. P. 242-246.
  119. Odibo A.O., Raab E., ElovitzM., Merrill J.D. et al. Prenatal mild pyelectasis: evaluating the thresholds of renal pelvic diameter associated with normal postnatal renal function // J. Ultrasound Med. 2004. Vol. 23, N 4. P. 513-517.
  120. FembachS.K., MaizelsM., Conway J.J. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology 11 Pediatr. Radiol. 1993. Vol. 23, N 6. P. 478-480.
  121. Rooks V.J., Lebowitz R.L. Extrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction from a crossing renal vessel: demography and imaging // Pediatr. Radiol. 2001. Vol. 31, N 2. P. 120-124.
  122. Campbell M.F. Anomalies of the ureter // Urology. 3rd ed. / eds M.F. Campbell, J.H. Harrison. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1970. P. 1512.
  123. Cremin BJ. A review of the ultrasonic appearances of posterior urethral valve and ureteroceles // Pediatr. Radiol. 1986. Vol. 16. P. 357-364.
  124. ZerinJ.M., Baker D.R., Casale J.A. Singlesystem ureteroceles in infants and children: imaging features // Pediatr. Radiol. 2000. Vol. 30. P. 139-46.
  125. Blane C.E., DiPietro M.A., Zeim J.M. et al. Renal sonography is not a reliable screening examination for vesicoureteral reflux // J. Urol. 1993. Vol. 150. P. 752-755.
  126. Grossklaus D.J., Pope J.C., Adams M.C., Brock J.W. Is postoperative cystography necessary after ureteral reimplantation? // Urology. 2001. Vol. 58, N 6. P. 1041-1045.
  127. DinneenM.D., Dhillon H.K., Ward H.C., Duffy P.G. et al. Antenatal diagnosis of posterior urethral valves // Br. J. Urol. 1993. Vol. 72, N 3. P. 364-369.
  128. Siegel MJ. The acute scrotum // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 1997. Vol. 35, N 4. P. 959-976.
  129. Baud C., Veyrac C., Couture A. et al. Spiral twist of the spermatic cord: a reliable sign of testicular torsion // Pediatr. Radiol. 1998. Vol. 28. P. 950-954.
  130. Kaye J.D., Levitt S.B., Gitlin J.S. et al. Parenchymal echotexture predicts testicular salvage after torsion — a new paradigm to determine the need for emergent exploration // J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 180, N 4. P. 1733-1736.
  131. Strauss S., Faingold R., Manor H. Torsion of the testicular appendages: sonographic appearance // J. Ultrasound Med. 1997. Vol. 16. P. 189-192.
  132. Ferguson R. Prostatic neoplasms; their diagnosis by needle puncture and aspiration // Am. J.Surg. 1930. Vol. 9. P. 507-511.
  133. Astraldi A. Diagnosis of cancer of the prostate; biopsy by rectal route // Urol. Cutaneous Rev. 1937. Vol. 41. P. 421-427.
  134. Wild J., Reid J. Fourth Annual Conference in Ultrasound Therapy. Philadelphia, 1955.
  135. Wantanabe H., Kato H., Kato T. Diagnostic application of ultrasonotomography to the prostate // Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1968. Vol. 59. P. 273-279.
  136. Hodge K.K., McNeal J.E., Terris M.K. et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate//J. Urol. 1989. Vol. 142. P. 71-75.
  137. Crawford E.D., Haynes Jr A.L., Story M.W. et al. Prevention of urinary tract infection and sepsis following transrectal prostatic biopsy // J. Urol. 1982. Vol. 127. P. 449-451.
  138. Berger A.P., Gozzi C., Steiner H. et al. Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores // J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 171. P. 1478-1480.
  139. Cannon Jr G.M., Smaldone M.C., Paterson D.L. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase gram-negative sepsis following prostate biopsy: implications for use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis // Can. J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 14. P. 3653-3655.
  140. Ozden E., BostanciY., Yakupoglu K.Y. et al. Incidence of acute prostatitis caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli after transrectal prostate biopsy // Urology. 2009. Vol. 74, N 1. P. 119-123.
  141. DajaniA.S., Taubert K.A., Wilson W. et al. Prevention of bacterial endocarditis: recommendations by the American Heart Association I/ Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997. Vol. 25. P. 1448-1158.
  142. Nishimura R.A., Carabello B.A., Faxon D.P. et al. АСС/ AHA 2008 guideline update on valvular heart disease: focused update on infective endocarditis: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons // Circulation. 2008. Vol. 118. P. 887.
  143. Bratzler D.W., Houck P.M. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project // Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004. Vol. 38. P. 1706-1715.
  144. Lindert K.A., Kabalin J.N., Terris M.K. Bacteremia and bacteriuria after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 164. P. 76-80.
  145. De Sio M., D’Armiento M., Di Lorenzo G. et al. The need to reduce patient discomfort during transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: what do we know? // BJU Int. 2005. Vol. 96. P. 977-983.
  146. Soloway M.S. Do unto others — why I would want anesthesia for my prostate biopsy // Urology. 2003. Vol. 62. P. 973.
  147. NijsH.G., Essink-Bot M.L., DeKoning H.J. et al. Why do men refuse or attend populationbased screening for prostate cancer? // J. Public Health Med. 2000. Vol. 22. P. 312-316.
  148. Nash P.A., Bruce J.E., Indudhara R. et al. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate // J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 155. P. 607— 609.
  149. Schostak M., Christoph F., Muller M. et al. Optimizing local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate // Urology. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 253-257.
  150. Trucchi A., De Nunzio C., Mariani S. et al. Local anesthesia reduces pain associated with transrectal prostatic biopsy. A prospective randomized study // Urol. Int. 2005. Vol. 74. P. 209-213.
  151. Hergan L., KasheflC., Parsons J.K. Local anesthetic reduces pain associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: ameta-analysis//Urology. 2007. Vol. 69. P. 520— 525.
  152. Bozlu M., Atici S., Ulusoy E. et al. Periprostatic lidocaine infiltration and/or synthetic opioid (meperidine or tramadol) administration have no analgesic benefit during prostate biopsy. A prospective randomized double-blind place-bo-controlled study comparing different methods // Urol. Int. 2004. Vol. 72. P. 308.
  153. VanniA.P., SchaalC.H., Costa R.P. et al. Is the periprostatic anesthetic blockade advantageous in ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy? I/ Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 30. P. 114.
  154. Walsh K., O’Brien T., Salemmi A. et al. A randomised trial of periprostatic local anaesthetic for transrectal biopsy // Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2003. Vol. 6. P. 242-244.
  155. Adamakis L, Mitropoulos D., Haritopoulos K. et al. Pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective trial comparing periprostatic infiltration with lidocaine with the intrarectal instillation of lidocaine-prilocain cream // World J Urol. 2004. Vol. 22. P. 281.
  156. Obek C., Ozkan B., Tunc B. et al. Comparison of 3 different methods of anesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial // J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 172. P. 502-505.
  157. Rabets J.C., Jones J.S., Patel A.R. et al. Bupivacaine provides rapid, effective periprostatic anesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy // BJU Int. 2004. Vol. 93. P. 1216-1217.
  158. Nambirajan T., Woolsey S., Mahendra V. et al. Efficacy and safety periprostatic local anesthetic injection in transrectal biopsy of the prostrate: a prospective randomized study // Surgeon. 2004. Vol. 2. P. 221-224.
  159. Terris M.K., Stamey T.A. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound // J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 145. P. 984-987.
  160. Djavan B., Zlotta A., Remzi M. et al. Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 1144-1148.
  161. Zagoria R.J. Genitourinary radiology // The Requisites. 2nd ed. / ed. J.H. Thrall. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, 2004. P. 335-338.
  162. Gregg D.C., StyJ.R. Sonographic diagnosis of enlarged prostatic utricle // J. Ultrasound Med. 1989. Vol. 8. P. 51.
  163. McDermott V., OrrJ .D., Wild S.R. Duplicated Mullerian duct remnants associated with unilateral renal agenesis // Abdom. Imaging. 1993. Vol. 18. P. 193.
  164. King B.F., Hattery R.R., Lieber M.M. et al. Congenital cystic disease of the seminal vesicle // Radiology. 1991. Vol. 178. P. 207-211.
  165. Frauscher F., Klauser A., Volgger H. et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 167. P. 1648— 1652.
  166. Shinohara K., Scardino P.T., Carter S.S. et al. Pathologic basis of the sonographic appearance of the normal and malignant prostate // Urol. Clin. North Am. 1989. Vol. 16. P. 675-691.
  167. Terris M.K., Macy M., Freiha F.S. Transrectal ultrasound appearance of prostatic granulomas secondary to bacillus Calmette-Guerin instillation //J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 158. P. 126-127.
  168. Purohit R.S., Shinohara K., Meng M.V. et al. Imaging clinically localized prostate cancer // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 279— 293.
  169. Varghese S.L., Grossfeld G.D. The prostatic gland: malignancies other than adenocarcinomas // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2000. Vol. 38. P. 179-202.
  170. Ramey J.R., Halpern E.J., Gomella L.G. Ultrasonography and biopsy of the prostate // Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 3. 9th ed. / ed. A.J. Wein. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2007. P. 2883-2895.
  171. Bigler S.A., Deering R.E., Brawer M.K. Comparison of microscopic vascularity in benign and malignant prostate tissue // Hum. Pathol. 1993. Vol. 24. P. 220-226.
  172. Cornud E, Hamida K., Flam T. et al. Endorectal color Doppler sonography and endorectal MR imaging features of nonpalpable prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy findings // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000.Vol. 175. P. 1161-1168.
  173. Halpern E.J., Strup S.E. Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000. Vol. 174. P. 623-627.
  174. Arger P.H., Malkowicz S.B., VanArsdalen K.N. et al. Color and power Doppler sonography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison between vascular density and total vascularity // J. Ultrasound Med. 2004. Vol. 23. P. 623.
  175. Okihara K., Kojima M., Nakanouchi T. et al. Transrectal power Doppler imaging in the detection of prostate cancer // BJU Int. 2000. Vol. 85. P. 1053-1057.
  176. Kelly I.M., LeesW.R., Rickards D. Prostate cancer and the role of color Doppler US // Radiology. 1993. Vol. 189. P. 153-159.
  177. Halpern E.J., Frauscher E, Strup S.E. et al. Prostate: high-frequency Doppler US imaging for cancer detection // Radiology. 2002. Vol. 225. P. 71-77.
  178. Levine M.A., Ittman M., Melamed J. et al. Two consecutive sets of transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsies of the prostate for the detection of prostate cancer // J. Urol. 1998. Vol. 159. P. 471.
  179. Eskew L.A., Bare R.L., McCullough D.L. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate // J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 157. P. 199-203.
  180. Babaian R.J., Toi A., Kamoi K. et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 152-157.
  181. Naughton C.K., Miller D.C., Mager D.E. et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 164. P. 388.
  182. Presti Jr J.C., Chang J.J., BhargavaV. et al. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 163-166.
  183. Terris M.K., Pham T.Q., Issa M.M. et al. Routine transition zone and seminal vesicle biopsies in all patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies are not indicated // J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 157. P. 204-206.
  184. Epstein J.I., Walsh P.C., SauvageotJ. et al. Use of repeat sextant and transition zone biopsies for assessing extent of prostate cancer // J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 158. P. 1886-1890.
  185. Mazal P R., Haitel A., Windischberger C. et al. Spatial distribution of prostate cancers undetected on initial needle biopsies // Eur. Urol. 2001.Vol. 39. P. 662-668.
  186. Chang J.J., ShinoharaK., Hovey R.M. et al. Prospective evaluation of systematic sextant transition zone biopsies in large prostates for cancer detection // Urology. 1998. Vol. 52. P. 89-93.
  187. Katsuto Shinohara V.M., ChiT., Carroll P. Prostate needle biopsy techniques and interpretation // Genitourinary Oncology. 3rd ed. / eds S. Voegelzang, Shipley D. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, 2006. P. 111-119.
  188. DjavanB., Remzi M., MarbergerM. When to biopsy and when to stop biopsying // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2003. Vol. 30. P. 252-262.
  189. Keetch D.W., Catalona W.J., Smith D.S. Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values//!. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151. P. 1571-1574. Djavan B., Ravery V, Zlotta A. et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? // J. Urol. 2001. Vol. 166. P. 1679-1683.
  190. Catalona W.J., Partin A.W., Slawin K.M. et al. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial // JAMA. 1998. Vol. 279. P. 1542-1547.
  191. Wang R., Chinnaiyan A.M., Dunn R.L. et al. Rational approach to implementation of prostate cancer antigen 3 into clinical care // Cancer. 2009. Vol. 115, N 17. P. 3879-3886.
  192. Haese A., de la Taille A., van Poppel H. et al. Clinical utility of the PCA3 urine assay in European men scheduled for repeat biopsy // Eur. Urol. 2008. Vol. 54. P. 1081.
  193. Bott S.R., Henderson A., McLarty E. et al. A brachytherapy template approach to standardize saturation prostatic biopsy // BJU Int. 2004. Vol. 93. P. 629-630.
  194. Lane B.R., Zippe C.D., Abouassaly R. et al. Saturation technique does not decrease cancer detection during follow up after initial prostate biopsy // J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 179. P. 1746— 1750.
  195. Borboroglu P.G., Comer S.W., Riffenburgh R.H. et al. Extensive repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in patients with previous benign sextant biopsies // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 158-162.
  196. Stewart C.S., Leibovich B.C., Weaver A.L. et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy technique after previous negative sextant biopsies // J. Urol. 2001. Vol. 166. P. 86-91.
  197. Fleshner N., Klotz L. Role of «saturation biopsy» in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases // Urology. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 93-97.
  198. Moran B.J. et al. Re-biopsy of the prostate using a stereotactic transperineal technique // J. Urol. 2006. Vol. 176. P. 1376-1381.
  199. Egawa S., Wheeler T.M., Scardino P.T. The sonographic appearance of irradiated prostate cancer// Br. J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 68. P. 172. Whittington R., Broderick G.A., Arger P. et al. The effect of androgen deprivation on the early changes in prostate volume following transperineal ultrasound guided interstitial therapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1999. Vol. 44. P. 1107.
  200. Kapoor D.A., Wasserman N.F., Zhang G. et al. Value of transrectal ultrasound in identifying local disease after radical prostatectomy // Urology. 1993. Vol. 41. P. 594-597.
  201. Goldenberg S.L., Carter M., Dashefsky S. et al. Sonographic characteristics of the ure-throvesical anastomosis in the early postradical prostatectomy patient // J. Urol. 1992. Vol. 147. P. 1307-1309.
  202. Rodriguez L.V., Terris M.K. Risks and complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature // J. Urol. 1998. Vol. 160. P. 2115-2120.
  203. Maatman T.J., Bigham D., Stirling B. Simplified management of post-prostate biopsy rectal bleeding // Urology. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 508. Brullet E., Guevara M.C., Campo R. et al. Massive rectal bleeding following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy // Endoscopy. 2000. Vol. 32. P. 792-795.
  204. Raaijmakers R., KirkelsW.J., Roobol M.J. et al. Complication rates and risk factors of 5802 transrectal ultrasound-guided sextant biopsies of the prostate within a populationbased screening program // Urology. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 826-830.
  205. Thompson P.M., Pryor J.P., Williams J.P. et al. The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach // Br. J. Urol. 1982. Vol. 54. P. 736-740. Desmond P.M., Clark J., Thompson I.M. et al. Morbidity with contemporary prostate biopsy//J. Urol. 1993. Vol. 150. P. 1425-1426. Moul J.W., Bauer J.J., Srivastava S. et al. Perineal seeding of prostate cancer as the only evidence of clinical recurrence 14 years after needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy: molecular correlation // Urology. 1998. Vol. 51. P. 158.
  206. Moul J.W., Miles B.J., Skoog S.J. et al. Risk factors for perineal seeding of prostate cancer after needle biopsy // J. Urol. 1989. Vol. 142. P. 86-88.
  207. Bastacky S.S., Walsh P.C., Epstein J.I. Needle biopsy associated tumor tracking of adenocarcinoma of the prostate // J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 145. P. 1003.
  208. Koppie T.M., Grady B.P. Shinohara K. Rectal wall recurrence of prostatic adenocarcinoma // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 168. P. 2120.
  209. Hara N., KasaharaT., Kawasaki T. et al. Frequency of PSA-mRNA-bearing cells in the peripheral blood of patients after prostate biopsy // Br. J. Cancer. 2001. Vol. 85. P. 557— 562.
  210. Meng M.V., Shinohara K., Grossfeld G.D. Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy // Urol. Oncol. 2003. Vol. 21. P. 145.
  211. Oyasu R., Bahnson R.R., Nowels K. et al. Cytological atypia in the prostate gland: frequency, distribution and possible relevance to carcinoma//J. Urol. 1986. Vol. 135. P. 959-962.
  212. Prange W., ErbersdoblerA., Hammerer P. et al. Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy specimens // Urology. 2001. Vol. 57. P. 486-490.
  213. Davidson D., Bostwick D.G., Qian J. et al. Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for adenocarcinoma: predictive accuracy in needle biopsies // J. Urol. 1995. Vol. 154. P. 1295-1299.
  214. Lefkowitz G.K., Sidhu G.S., Torre P. et al. Is repeat prostate biopsy for high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia necessary after routine 12-core sampling? // Urology. 2001. Vol. 58. P. 999-1003.
  215. Helpap B.G., Bostwick D.G., Montironi R. The significance of atypical adenomatous hyperplasia and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia for the development of prostate carcinoma. An update // Virchows Arch. 1995. Vol. 426. P. 425-434.
  216. Helpap B., Bonkhoff H., Cockett A. et al. Relationship between atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostatic adenocarcinoma // Pathologica. 1997. Vol. 89. P. 288-300.
  217. Iczkowski K.A., Chen H.M., Yang X.J. et al. Prostate cancer diagnosed after initial biopsy with atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to cancer found on initial biopsy // Urology. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 851-854.
  218. Iczkowski K.A., MacLennan G.T., Bostwick D.G. Atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy in prostate needle biopsies: clinical significance in 33 cases // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1997. Vol. 21. P. 1489-1495.
  219. Alsikafi N.F., Brendler C.B., Gerber G.S. et al. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with adjacent atypia is associated with a higher incidence of cancer on subsequent needle biopsy than high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia alone // Urology. 2001. Vol. 57. P. 296-300.
  220. Park S., Shinohara K., Grossfeld G.D. et al. Prostate cancer detection in men with prior high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical prostate biopsy // J Urol. 2001. Vol. 165. P. 1409-1414.
  221. Javidan J., Wood D.P. Clinical interpretation of the prostate biopsy // Urol. Oncol. 2003. Vol. 21. P. 141.
  222. Makhlouf A.A., Krupski T.L., Kunkle D. et al. The effect of sampling more cores on the predictive accuracy of pathological grade and tumour distribution in the prostate biopsy // BJU Int. 2004. Vol. 93. P. 271-274.
  223. Wills M.L., Sauvageot J., Partin A.W. et al. Ability of sextant biopsies to predict radical prostatectomy stage // Urology. 1998. Vol. 51. P. 759-764.
  224. RaveryV, Boccon-Gibod L.A., Dauge-Geffroy M.C. et al. Systematic biopsies accurately predict extracapsular extension of prostate cancer and persistent/ recurrent detectable PSA after radical prostatectomy // Urology. 1994. Vol. 44. P. 371-376.
  225. Badalament R.A., Miller M.C., Peller P.A. et al. An algorithm for predicting nonorgan confined prostate cancer using the results obtained from sextant core biopsies with prostate specific antigen level //J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 156. P. 1375-1380.
  226. D’Amico A.V,Whittington R., Malkowicz S.B. et al. Clinical utility of percent-positive prostate biopsies in predicting biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer // Mol. Urol. 2000. Vol. 4. P. 171.
  227. Naya Y., Slaton J.W., Troncoso P. et al. Tumor length and location of cancer on biopsy predict for side specific extraprostatic cancer extension//J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 171. P. 1093-1097.
  228. Freedland S.J., Aronson W.J., Terris M.K. et al. Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: results from SEARCH database // J. Urol. 2003. Vol. 169. P. 2136-2141.
  229. Freedland S.J., CsathyG.S., DoreyF. et al. Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 167. P. 516-520.
  230. Freedland S.J., CsathyG.S., Dorey F. et al. Clinical utility of percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer cutpoints to risk stratify patients before radical prostatectomy // Urology. 2002. Vol. 60. P. 84.
  231. Elliott S.P., Shinohara K., Logan S.L. et al. Sextant prostate biopsies predict side and sextant site of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 168. P. 105-109.
  232. Watanabe Н. et al. [Diagnostic application of ultra-sonotomography to the prostate] // Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1968. Vol. 59, N 4. P. 273-279.
  233. Hodge K.K. et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate//J. Urol. 1989. Vol. 142, N 1. P. 71—74, discussion 74—75.
  234. Beerlage H.P. Alternative therapies for localized prostate cancer // Curr. Urol. Rep. 2003. Vol. 4, N3. P. 216-220.
  235. Wasserman N.F. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review and ultrasound classification // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2006. Vol. 44, N 5. P. 689-710. VIII.
  236. Stravodimos K.G. et al. TRUS versus transabdominal ultrasound as a predictor of enucleated adenoma weight in patients with BPH: a tool for standard pre-operative work-up? // Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2009. Vol. 41, N 4. P. 767— 771.
  237. Smith J.F., Walsh T.J., Turek PJ. Ejaculatory duct obstruction // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2008.Vol. 35, N 2. P. 221-227. VIII.
  238. Raviv G. et al. Role of transrectal ultrasonography in the evaluation of azoospermic men with low-volume ejaculate // J. Ultrasound Med. 2006.Vol. 25, N 7. P. 825-829.
  239. ZahalskyM., NaglerH.M. Ultrasound and infertility: diagnostic and therapeutic uses // Curr. Urol. Rep. 2001. Vol. 2, N 6. P. 437-442.
  240. FrauscherF., KlauserA., Halpern E.J. Advances in ultrasound for the detection of prostate cancer// Ultrasound Q. 2002. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 135-142.
  241. Onur R. et al. Contemporary impact of transrectal ultrasound lesions for prostate cancer detection // J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 172, N 2. P. 512-514.
  242. Issa M., Oesterling J. Radiofrequency thermal therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia by transurethral needle ablation of the prostate // Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia / ed. P. Narayan. London: Churchill Livingstone, 2000. P. 269-280.
  243. Wheelahan J. et al. Minimally invasive nonlaser thermal techniques for prostatectomy: a systematic review. The ASERN1P-S review group // BJU Int. 2000. Vol. 86, N 9. P. 977-988.
  244. Eggener S.E. et al. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 178, N 6. P. 2260-2267.
  245. Aus G. Current status of HIFU and cryotherapy in prostate cancer — a review // Eur. Urol. 2006. Vol. 50, N 5. P. 927-934. discussion 934.
  246. Marberger M. et al. New treatments for localized prostate cancer // Urology. 2008. Vol. 72, N 6, suppl. P. S36-S43.
  247. Polascik T.J., Mouraviev V. Focal therapy for prostate cancer // Curr. Opin. Urol. 2008. Vol. 18, N 3. P. 269-274.
  248. Dehnad H. et al. Clinical feasibility study for the use of implanted gold seeds in the prostate as reliable positioning markers during megavoltage irradiation // Radiother. Oncol. 2003. Vol. 67, N 3. P. 295-302.
  249. Linden R.A. et al. Technique of outpatient placement of intraprostatic fiducial markers before external beam radiotherapy // Urology. 2009.Vol. 73, N 4. P. 881-886.
  250. Oliveira P. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of prostatic abscess // Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2003. Vol. 29, N 1. P. 30-34.
  251. Lim J.W. et al. Treatment of prostatic abscess: value of transrectal ultrasonographically guided needle aspiration // J. Ultrasound Med. 2000. Vol. 19, N 9. P. 609-617.
  252. Kojima M. et al. Doppler resistive index in benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation with ultrasonic appearance of the prostate and infravesical obstruction // Eur. Urol. 2000. Vol. 37, N 4. P. 436-442.
  253. Halpern EJ. et al. High-frequency Doppler US of the prostate: effect of patient position // Radiology. 2002. Vol. 222, N 3. P. 634-639.
  254. Kossoff G. Basic physics and imaging characteristics of ultrasound // World J. Surg. 2000. Vol. 24, N 2. P. 134-142.
  255. Terris M.K., Stamey T.A. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound // J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 145, N 5. P. 984-987.
  256. Djavan B. et al. Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163, N 4. P. 1144—1148. discussion 1148—1149.
  257. Rodriguez L.V., Terris M.K. Risksand complications of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a prospective study and review of the literature // J. Urol. 1998. Vol. 160, N6. Pt 1. P. 2115-2120.
  258. Batura D. et al. Adding amikacin to fluoro-quinolone-based antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces prostate biopsy infection rates // BJU Int. 2011. Vol. 107, N 5. P. 760-764.
  259. McNeal J.E. The zonal anatomy of the prostate// Prostate. 1981. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 35—49.
  260. Christian J. D. et al. Corpora amylacea in adenocarcinoma of the prostate: incidence and histology within needle core biopsies // Mod. Pathol. 2005. Vol. 18, N 1. P. 36-39.
  261. Halpern E. Anatomy of the prostate gland // Imaging of the Prostate / eds E. Halpern, D. Cochlin, B. Goldberg. London: Martin Du-nitz, 2002. P. 3-15.
  262. Geramoutsos I. et al. Clinical correlation of prostatic lithiasis with chronic pelvic pain syndromes in young adults // Eur. Urol. 2004. Vol. 45, N 3. P. 333-337, discussion 337-338.
  263. Sheih C.P. et al. Seminal vesicle cyst associated with ipsilateral renal malformation and hemivertebra: report of 2 cases //J. Urol. 1993. Vol. 150, N4. P. 1214-1215.
  264. Narayana A. Tumors of the epididymis, seminal vesicles, and vas deferens (spermatic cord) // Genitourinary Oncology / eds D. Culp, S. Loening. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, 1985. P. 385-398.
  265. Al-Saeed O. et al. Seminal vesicle masses detected incidentally during transrectal sonographic examination of the prostate // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2003. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 201— 206.
  266. Cochlin D.L. Cysts and congenital anomalies of the prostate and ejaculatory ducts // Imaging ofthe Prostate/eds EJ. Halpern, D.L. Cochlin, B.B. Golberg. London: Martin Dunitz, 2002. P. 115-128.
  267. McDermott V, Orr J.D. et al. Duplicated Mullerian duct remnants associated with unilateral renal agenesis//Abdom. Imaging. 1993. Vol. 18, N 2. P. 193-195.
  268. King B.F., Hattery R.R. et al. Congenital cystic disease of the seminal vesicle // Radiology. 1991. Vol. 178, N 1. P. 207-211.
  269. Egawa S., Wheeler T.M. et al. The sonographic appearance of irradiated prostate cancer // Br. J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 68, N 2. P. 172-177.
  270. Stone N.N., Stock R.G. The effect of brachytherapy, external beam irradiation and hormonal therapy on prostate volume // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 177, N 3. P. 925-928.
  271. Whittington R., Broderick G.A. et al. The effect of androgen deprivation on the early changes in prostate volume following transperineal ultrasound guided interstitial therapy for localized carcinoma of the prostate // Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 1999. Vol. 44, N 5. P. 1107-1110.
  272. Chen M.E. et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis // J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 158, N 6. P. 2168-2175.
  273. Daneshgari F. et al. Computer simulation of the probability of detecting low volume carcinoma of the prostate with six random systematic core biopsies // Urology. 1995. Vol. 45, N 4. P. 604-609.
  274. Bigler S.A., Deering R.E., Brawer M.K. Comparison of microscopic vascularity in benign and malignant prostate tissue // Hum. Pathol. 1993. Vol. 24, N 2. P. 220-226.
  275. Taylor L.S. et al. Three-dimensional so-noelastography: principles and practices // Phys. Med. Biol. 2000. Vol. 45, N 6. P. 1477— 1494.
  276. Newman J.S., BreeR.L., Rubin J.M. Prostate cancer: diagnosis with color Doppler sonography with histologic correlation of each biopsy site // Radiology. 1995. Vol. 195, N 1. P. 86—90. Halpern E.J., Strup S.E. Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000. Vol. 174, N 3. P. 623-627.
  277. Cho J.Y., Kim S.H., Lee S.E. Diffuse prostatic lesions: role of color Doppler and power Doppler ultrasonography // J. Ultrasound Med. 1998. Vol. 17, N 5. P. 283-287.
  278. Okihara K. et al. Ultrasonic power Doppler imaging for prostatic cancer: a preliminary report // Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1997. Vol. 182, N 4. P. 277-281.
  279. Nelson E.D. et al. Targeted biopsy of the prostate: the impact of color Doppler imaging and elastography on prostate cancer detection and Gleason score // Urology. 2007. Vol. 70, N 6. P. 1136-1140.
  280. Furlow B. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound // Radiol. Technol. 2009. Vol. 80, N 6. P. 547S-561S.
  281. Brawer M.K. et al. Predictors of pathologic stage in prostatic carcinoma. The role of neovascularity // Cancer. 1994. Vol. 73, N 3. P. 678-687.
  282. Frauscher F. et al. Detection of prostate cancer with a microbubble ultrasound contrast agent // Lancet. 2001. Vol. 357, N 9271. P. 1849-1850.
  283. Frauscher F. et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy with conventional systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 167, N4. P. 1648-1652.
  284. Mitterberger M. et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 178, N 2. P. 464—468, discussion 468.
  285. Linden R.A. et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound flash replenishment method for directed prostate biopsies // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 178, N 6. P. 2354-2358.
  286. Hamper U.M. et al. Three-dimensional US of the prostate: early experience // Radiology. 1999. Vol. 212, N 3. P. 719-723.
  287. Krouskop T.A. et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression // Ultrason. Imaging. 1998. Vol. 20, N 4. P. 260— 274.
  288. Pallwein L. et al. Sonoelastography of the prostate: comparison with systematic biopsy findings in 492 patients // Eur. J. Radiol. 2008. Vol. 65, N 2. P. 304-310.
  289. Mitterberger М., PinggeraG.M., Mueller Т. et al. Dynamic transurethral sonography and 3D reconstruction of the rhabdosphincter and urethra // J. Ultrasound Med. 2006. Vol. 25. P. 315-320.
  290. Yang J.M., Huang W.C. The significance of urethral hyperechogenicity in female lower urinary tract symptoms // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004. Vol. 24, N 1. P. 67-71.
  291. Dietz H.P., Eldridge A., Grace M., Clarke В. Test-retest reliability of the ultrasound assessment of bladder neck mobility // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2003. Vol. 14, suppl. 1. P. S57-S58.
  292. Dietz H.P., Wilson P.D. The influence ofbladder volume on the position and mobility of the urethrovesical junction // Int. Urogynecol. J. 1999. Vol. 10, N I. P. 3-6.
  293. Oerno A., Dietz H.P. Levator co-activation is an important confounder of pelvic organ descent on Valsalva. In: ICS annual scientific meeting (abstract). Christchurch, 2006.
  294. Alper T., Cetinkaya M., Okutgen S., Kokcu A., Lu E. Evaluation of urethrovesical angle by ultrasound in women with and without urinary stress incontinence // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2001. Vol. 12, N 5. P. 308-311.
  295. Delair S.M., Kurzrock E.A. Clinical utility of ureteral jets: disparate opinions // J. Endou-rol. 2006. Vol. 20, N2. P. 111-114.
  296. Kuhn A., Genoud S., Robinson D. et al. Sonographic transvaginal bladder wall thickness: does the measurement discriminate between urodynamic diagnoses? // Neurourol. Urodyn. 2011. Vol. 30, N3. P. 325-328.
  297. Lekskulchai O., Dietz H.P. Normal values for detrusor wall thickness in young Caucasian women // International Continence Society Annual Scientific Meeting (abstract). Montreal, 2005. Blatt A.H., Titus J., Chan L. Ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness in the assessment of voiding dysfunction // J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 179, N 6. P. 2275-2278.
  298. Gerrard E.R., Lloyd L.K., Kubricht W.S. et al. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of urethral diverticulum // J. Urol. 2003. Vol. 169, N4. P. 1395-1397.
  299. Ockrim J.L., Allen D.J., Shah P.J. et al. A tertiary experience of urethral diverticulectomy: diagnosis, imaging, and surgical outcomes // BJU Int. 2009. Vol. 103, N II. P. 1550— 1554.
  300. Tunn R., Petri E. Introital and transvaginal ultrasound as the main tool in the assessment of urogenital and pelvic floor dysfunction: an imaging panel and practical approach // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2003. Vol. 22, N 2. P. 205-213.
  301. Creigton S.M., Pearce J.M., Stanton S.L. Perineal video-ultrasonography in the assessment of vaginal prolapse: early observations // Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1992. Vol. 99, N 4. P. 310-313.
  302. Dietz H.P., Haylen B.T., Broome J. Ultrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapse // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 18, N5. P. 511-514.
  303. Bump R.C., MattiasonA., Bo K. et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996. Vol. 175, N 1. P. 10-17.
  304. Dietz H.P. What’s «normal» pelvic organ descent, and what’s prolapse? // ICS Annual Scientific Meeting. Christchurch, 2006.
  305. Dietz H.P., SteensmaA.B. Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2005. Vol. 26. P. 73-77.
  306. Halsaka M., OtcenasekM., MartamA. et al. Pelvic anatomy changes after TVT procedure assessed by MRI // Int. Urogynecol. J. 1999. Vol. 10, suppl. 1. P. S87-S88.
  307. Kaum H.J., Wolff F. TVT: on midurethral tape positioning and its influence on continence // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2002. Vol. 13, N 2. P. 110— 115.
  308. Dietz H.P., Wilson P.D. The «iris effect»; how two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound can help us understand anti-incontinence procedures // Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2004. Vol. 23, N 3. P. 267-271.
  309. Ng C.C., Lee L.C., Han W.H. Use of three-dimensional ultrasound to assess the clinical importance of midurethral placement of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) for the treatment of incontinence // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2005. Vol. 16, N 3. P. 220-225.
  310. Shek K., Dietz H.P., RaneA. Transobturator mesh anchoring for the repair of large or recurrent cystocele // ICS Annual Scientific Meeting. Christchurch, 2006.
  311. Achtari O.A., O’Reilly B., Schierlitz L. et al. Mesh erosion following vaginal repair: is I avoidable? // Int. Urogynecol. J. 2003. Vol. 14, suppl. 1. P. S65.
  312. Firoozi F., Goldman H.B. Transvaginal excision of mesh erosion involving the bladder after mesh placement using a prolapse kit: a novel technique // Urology. 2010. Vol. 75, N 1. P. 203-206.
  313. Ridgeway B., Walters M., ParaisaM.F. et al. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008. Vol. 199. P. 703-707.
  314. Jacob Р., Rai В.Р., Todd A.W. Suprapubic catheter insertion using an ultrasound-guided technique and literature review // BJU Int. 2012. Vol. 110, N6. P. 779-784.
  315. Manieri C., Carter S., Romano G., Trucchi A. et al. The diagnosis of bladder outlet obstruction in men by ultrasound measurement of bladder wall thickness//J. Urol. 1998. Vol. 159. P. 761-765.
  316. Ozden E., Turgut A.T., TurkolmezK., Resorlu B. et al. Effect of bladder carcinoma location on detection rates by ultrasonography and computed tomography // Urology. 2007. Vol. 69, N 5. P. 889-892.
  317. ItzchakY., Singer D., Fischelovitch Y. Ultrasonographic assessment of bladder tumors. I. Tumor detection // J. Urol. 1981. Vol. 126, N 1. P. 31-33.
  318. Ozden E., Turgut A.T., Yesil M., Gogus C. et al. A new parameter for staging bladder carcinoma: ultra-sonographic contact length and height-to-length ratio // J. Ultrasound Med. 2007. Vol. 26. P. 1137-1142.
  319. Franco G., De Nunzio C., Costantino L., Tubaro A. et al. Ultrasound assessment of intra-vesical prostatic protrusion and detrusor wall thickness — new standards for noninvasive bladder outlet obstruction diagnosis? // J. Urol. 2010. Vol. 183. P. 2270— 2274.
  320. ChiaS.J., Heng C.T., Chan S.P., Foo K.T. Correlation of intravesical prostatic protrusion with bladder outlet obstruction // BJU Int. 2003. Vol. 914, N4. P. 371-374.
  321. Lieber M.M., Jacobson D.J., McGree M.E. et al. Intravesical prostatic protrusion in men in Olmsted County, Minnesota // J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 182, N 6. P. 2819-2824.
  322. Hoffer M., editor. Ultrasound teaching manual: the basics of performing and interpreting ultrasound scans. Stutgart, NY: Georg Thieme, 2005.
  323. Middleton W. General and vascular ultrasound. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2007.
  324. Block B. The practice of ultrasound: a step by step guide to abdominal scanning. Stutgart, NY: Georg Thieme, 2004.
  325. Doubilet Р.М., Benson С.В., Silverman S.G. et al. The penis // Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 14. 1991. Vol. 12. P. 157. 15.
  326. ShinD., Pregenzer Jr G., GardinJ.M. Erectile dysfunction: a disease marker for cardiovascular disease // Cardiol. Rev. 2011. Vol. 19. P. 5-11.
  327. Tomada N., Tomada I., Botelho F. et al. Are all metabolic syndrome components responsible for penile hemodynamics impairment in patients with erectile dysfunction? The role 16. of body fat mass assessment // J. Sex. Med. 2011. Vol. 8, N 3. P. 831-839.
  328. Corona G., Monami M., BoddiV. et al. Male sexuality and cardiovascular risk. A cohort study in patients with erectile dysfunction // J. Sex. Med. 2010. Vol. 7. P. 1918-1927.
  329. Wing R.R. Long-term effects of a lifestyle intervention on weight and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes mel-litus: four-year results of the Look AHEAD trial // Arch. Intern. Med. 2010. Vol. 170. P. 1566-1575.
  330. Hayashi T., Farrell M.A., Chaput L.A. et al. Lifestyle intervention, behavioral changes, and improvement in cardiovascular risk pro fi les in the California WISEWOMAN project // J. Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010. Vol. 19. P. 1129-1138.
  331. Miner M.M. Erectile dysfunction: a harbinger or consequence: does its detection lead to a window of curability? // J. Androl. 2011. Vol. 32. P. 125-134.
  332. Inman B.A., SauverJ.L., Jacobson D.J. et al. A population-based, longitudinal study of erectile dysfunction and future coronary artery disease // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2009. Vol. 84. P. 108-113.
  333. Billups K.L., BankA.J., Padma-Nathan H. et al. Erectile dysfunction as a harbinger for increased cardiometabolic risk // Int. J. Impot. Res. 2008. Vol. 20. P. 236.
  334. Patel U., Lees W.R. Penile sonography // Ultrasound of Super ficial structures / eds L. Solibiati, G. Rizzatto. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1995. P. 229-242.
  335. Wilkins C.J., Sriprasad S., Sidhu P.S. Colour Doppler ultrasound of the penis // Clin. Radiol. 2003. Vol. 58. P. 514-523.
  336. Kim S.H., PaickJ.S., Lee S.E. et al. Doppler sonography of deep cavemosal artery of the penis: variation of peak systolic velocity according to sampling location // J. Ultrasound Med. 1994. Vol. 13. P. 591-594.
  337. Roy C., Saussine C., Tuchmann C. et al. Duplex Doppler sonography of the flaccid penis: potential role in the evaluation of impotence // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2000. Vol. 28. P. 290-294. Mancini M., Bartolini M., Maggi M. etal. Duplex ultrasound evaluation of cavemosal peak systolic velocity and waveform acceleration in the penile flaccid state: clinical significance in the assessment of the arterial supply in patients with erectile dysfunction // Int. J. Androl. 2000. Vol. 23. P. 199-204.
  338. van Ahlen H., Peskar B.A., Sticht G. et al. Pharmacokinetics of vasoactive substances administered into the human corpus cavernosum U J. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151. P. 1227— 1130.
  339. Patel U., Amin Z., Friedman E. et al. Colour flow and spectral Doppler imaging after papaverine-induced penile erection in 220 impotent men: study of temporal patterns and the importance of repeated sampling, velocity asymmetry and vascular anomalies // Clin. Radiol. 1993. Vol. 48. P. 18.
  340. Broderick G.A., Lue T.F. The penile blood flow study: evaluation of vasculogenic impotence /1 Erectile Dysfunction / eds U. Jonas, W.F. Thon, C.G. Stief. Berlin: Springer, 1991.
  341. Shabsigh R., Fishman I.J., Shotland Y. et al. Comparison of penile duplex ultrasonography with nocturnal penile tumescence monitoring for the evaluation of erectile impotence // J. Urol. 1990. Vol. 143. P. 924-927.
  342. Benson C.B., Vickers M.A. Sexual impotence caused by vascular disease: diagnosis with duplex sonography // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1989. Vol. 153. P. 1149-1153.
  343. LueT.F., Hricak H., Marich K.W. et al. Vasculogenic impotence evaluated by high-resolution ultrasonography and pulsed Doppler spectrum analysis // Radiology. 1985. Vol. 155. P. 777-781.
  344. Mueller S.C., Lue T.F. Evaluation of vasculogenic impotence // Urol. Clin. North Am. 1988. Vol. 15. P. 65-76.
  345. Pescatori E.S., Hatzichristou D.G., Nam-buri S. et al. A positive intracavemous injection test implies normal veno-occlusive but not necessarily normal arterial function: a hemodynamic study // J. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151. P. 1209-1216.
  346. Benson C.B., Aruny J.E., Vickers Jr M.A. Correlation of duplex sonogramphy with arteriography in patients with erectile dysfunction // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1993. Vol. 160. P. 71-73.
  347. Bassiouny H.S., Levine L.A. Penile duplex sonography in the diagnosis of venogenic impotence // J. Vase. Surg. 1991. Vol. 13. P. 75—82.
  348. QuamJ.P., KingB.F., James E.M. et al. Duplex and color Doppler sonographic evaluation of vasculogenic impotence // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1989. Vol. 153. P. 1141-1142.
  349. Naroda T., Yamanaka M., Matsushita K. et al. [Clinical studies for venogenic impotence with color Doppler ultrasonography — evaluation of resistance index of the cavernous artery] // Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi. 1996. Vol. 87. P. 1231.
  350. Cormio L., Bettocchi C., Ricapito V. et al. Resistance index as a prognostic factor for prolonged erection after penile dynamic colour Doppler ultrasonography // Eur. Urol. 1998. Vol. 33. P. 94-97.
  351. Feldman H.A., Johannes C.B., Derby C.A. et al. Erectile dysfunction and coronary risk factors: prospective results from the Massachusetts male aging study // Prev. Med. 2000. Vol. 30. P. 328-338.
  352. Blumentals W.A., Gomez-Caminero A., Joo S. et al. Should erectile dysfunction be considered as a marker for acute myocardial infarction? Results from a retrospective cohort study // Int. J. Impot. Res. 2004. Vol. 16. P. 350-353. Sullivan M.E., Thompson C.S., Dashwood M.R. et al. Nitric oxide and penile erection: is erectile dysfunction another manifestation of vascular disease? // Cardiovasc. Res. 1999. Vol. 43. P. 658-665.
  353. Solomon H., ManJ.W., Jackson G. Erectile dysfunction and the cardiovascular patient: endothelial dysfunction is the common denominator// Heart. 2003. Vol. 89. P. 251-253.
  354. Montorsi P., Montorsi F., Schulman C.C. Is erectile dysfunction the «tip of the iceberg» of a systemic vascular disorder? // Eur. Urol. 2003. Vol. 44. P. 352-354.
  355. Guay A.T. The emerging link between hypogonadism and metabolic syndrome // J. Androl. 2009. Vol. 30. P. 370-376.
  356. TraishA.M., GuayA.T. Are androgens critical for penile erections in humans? Examining the clinical and pre-clinical evidence // J. Sex. Med. 2006. Vol. 3. P. 382-404.
  357. Lue T.F., Tanagho E.A. Physiology of erection and pharmacological management of impotence//J. Urol. 1987. Vol. 137. P. 829-836.
  358. O’Kane P.D., Jackson G. Erectile dysfunction: is there silent obstructive coronary artery disease? // Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2001. Vol. 55. P. 219-220.
  359. Mulhall J., TelokenP., Barnas J. Vasculogenic erectile dysfunction is a predictor of abnormal stress echocardiography // J. Sex. Med. 2009. Vol. 6. P. 820-825.
  360. ZambonJ.P., Mendonca R.R., Wroclawski M.L. et al. Cardiovascular and metabolic syndrome risk among men with and without erectile dysfunction: case-control study // Sao Paulo Med. J. 2010. Vol. 128. P. 137-140.
  361. Mottillo S., Filion K.B., Genest J. et al. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010. Vol. 56. P. 1113-1132.
  362. Bohm М., Baumhakel М., Тео К. et al. Erectile dysfunction predicts cardiovascular events in high-risk patients receiving telmisartan, ramipril, or both: The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial/ Telmisartan Randomized AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant subjects with cardiovascular Disease (ONTARGET/ TRANSCEND) Trials // Circulation. 2010. Vol. 121. P. 1439.
  363. Batty G.D., LiQ., Czemichow S. et al. Erectile dysfunction and later cardiovascular disease in men with type 2 diabetes: prospective cohort study based on the ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified-Release Controlled Evaluation) trial //J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010. Vol. 56. P. 1908-1913.
  364. Kang B.C., Lee D.Y., ByunJ.Y. et al. Post-traumatic arterial priapism: colour Doppler examination and superselective arterial embolization // Clin. Radiol. 1998. Vol. 53. P. 830— 834.
  365. Asgari M.A., Hosseini S.Y., Safarinejad M.R. et al. Penile fractures: evaluation, therapeutic approaches and long-term results // J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 155. P. 148-149.
  366. El-Bahnasawy M.S., Gomha M.A. Penile fractures: the successful outcome of immediate surgical intervention // Int. J. Impot. Res. 2000. Vol. 12. P. 273-277.
  367. Atan A., Gungor S., Ozergin O. et al. Idiopathic penile mondors’ disease: a case report // Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 34. P. 97-99.
  368. DicuioM., PomaraG., AlesV. et al. Doppler ultra-sonography in a young patient with penile Mondor’s disease // Arch. Ital. Urol. Androl. 2005. Vol. 77. P. 58-59.
  369. Sasso E, Gulino G., BasarM. et al. Penile Mondors’ disease: an underestimated pathology /1 Br. J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 77. P. 729-732.
  370. Nachmann M.M., Jaffe J.S., Ginsberg P.C. et al. Sickle cell episode manifesting as superficial thrombophlebitis of the penis // J. Am. Osteopath. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 103. P. 102— 104.
  371. Luzzi G.A., Pattinson J., Wathen C.G. Penile Mondor’s disease and inherited thrombophilia // Int. J. STD AIDS. 2006. Vol. 17. P. 70.
  372. Brock G., Hsu G.L., Nunes L. et al. The anatomy of the tunica albuginea in the normal penis and Peyronie’s disease // J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 157. P. 276-281.
  373. Chou Y.H., TiuC.M., Pan H.B. et al. High-resolution real-time ultrasound in Peyronie’s disease // J. Ultrasound Med. 1987. Vol. 6. P. 67.
  374. Kadioglu A., Tefekli A., Erol H. et al. Color Doppler ultrasound assessment of penile vascular system in men with Peyronie’s disease // Int. J. Impot. Res. 2000. Vol. 12. P. 263.
  375. Horenblas S., Kroger R., Gallee M.P. et al. Ultrasound in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis; a useful addition to clinical staging? A comparison of ultrasound with histopathology// Urology. 1994. Vol. 43. P. 702-707.
  376. LontA.P., Besnard A.P., Gallee M.P. et al. A comparison of physical examination and imaging in determining the extent of primary penile carcinoma // BJU Int. 2003. Vol. 91. P. 493-495.
  377. Lan S.K., Lin C.W., Ho H.C. et al. Penile metastasis secondary to nasal NK/T-cell lymphoma// Urology. 2008. Vol. 72. P. 1014-1015.
  378. Gallentine M.L., Morey A.F. Imaging of the male urethra for stricture disease // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2002. Vol. 29. P. 361-372.
  379. Morey A.E, McAninchJ.W. Role of preoperative sonourethrography in bulbar urethral reconstruction//J. Urol. 1997. Vol. 158. P. 1376-1379.
  380. Choudhary S., Singh P., Sundar E. et al. A comparison of sonourethrography and retrograde urethrography in evaluation of anterior urethral strictures // Clin Radiol. 2004. Vol. 59. P. 736-742.
  381. Morey A.E, McAninchJ.W. Sonographic staging of anterior urethral strictures // J. Urol. 2000. Vol. 163. P. 1070-1075.
  382. Kim B., KawashimaA., LeRoyA.J. Imaging of the male urethra // Semin. Ultrasound CT MR. 2007. Vol. 28. P. 258-273.
  383. Bearcroft P.W., Berman L.H. Sonography in the evaluation of the male anterior urethra // Clin. Radiol. 1994. Vol. 49. P. 621-626.
  384. Dogra V, Bhatt S. Acute painful scrotum // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2004. Vol. 42, N 2. P. 349-363.
  385. Smart J.M. et al. Ultrasound findings of masses of the paratesticular space // Clin. Radiol. 2008.Vol. 63, N 8. P. 929-938.
  386. Hadziselimovic F. et al. The importance of mini-puberty for fertility in cryptorchidism // J. Urol. 2005. Vol. 174, N4, Pt 2. P. 1536-1539; discussion 1538—1539.
  387. Raivio T. et al. Serum androgen bioactivity in cryptorchid and noncryptorchid boys during the postnatal reproductive hormone surge // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003. Vol. 88, N 6. P. 2597-2599.
  388. Kuijper E.A. et al. Ultrasonographically measured testicular volumes in 0- to 6-year-old boys // Hum. Reprod. 2008. Vol. 23, N 4. P. 792-796.
  389. Aso C. et al. Gray-scale and color Doppler sonography of scrotal disorders in children: an update // Radiographics. 2005. Vol. 25, N 5. P. 1197-1214.
  390. Dogra VS. et al. Sonography of the scrotum // Radiology. 2003. Vol. 227, NLP. 18-36.
  391. Thomas R.D., Dewbury K.C. Ultrasound appearances of the rete testis // Clin. Radiol. 1993.Vol. 47, N2. P. 121-124.
  392. Bhatt S. et al. Imaging of non-neoplastic intra-testicular masses// Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2011. Vol. 17. P. 52-63.
  393. Wishahi M.M. Anatomy of the venous drainage of the human testis: testicular vein cast, microdissection and radiographic demonstration. A new anatomical concept // Eur. Urol. 1991. Vol. 20, N2. P. 154-160.
  394. Paltiel H.J., Rupich R.C., Babcock D.S. Maturational changes in arterial impedance of the normal testis in boys: Doppler sonographic study //AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1994. Vol. 163, N5. P. 1189-1193.
  395. Biagiotti G. et al. Spermatogenesis and spectral echo-colour Doppler traces from the main testicular artery 11 BJU Int. 2002. Vol. 90, N 9. P. 903-908.
  396. Unsal A. et al. Resistance and pulsatility index increase in capsular branches of testicular artery: indicator of impaired testicular microcirculation in varicocele? // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2007. Vol. 35, N4. P. 191-195.
  397. Pinggera G.M. et al. Assessment of the intra-testicular resistive index by colour Doppler ultrasonography measurements as a predictor of spermatogenesis // BJU Int. 2008. Vol. 101, N 6. P. 722-726.
  398. BalciA. et al. Long-term effect of varicocele repair on intratesticular arterial resistance index //J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2008. Vol. 36, N 3. P. 148-152.
  399. Nielsen M.E. Use and misuse of imaging by urologists // J. Urol. 2010. Vol. 184, N 1. P. 12-14.
  400. Douglas P.S. Improving imaging: our professional imperative // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006. Vol. 48, N 10. P. 2152-2155.
  401. Hendel R.C.etal.ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2006. Vol. 48, N 7. P. 1475-1497.
  402. Lee A. et al. Acute idiopathic scrotal edema: ultra-sonographic findings at an emergency unit I I Eur. Radiol. 2009. Vol. 19, N 8. P. 2075-2080.
  403. Thomas A.C. et al. Ultrasound findings of acute idiopathic scrotal edema // Sci. World J. 2004. Vol. 4, suppl. 1. P. 9-10.
  404. Grainger A.J., Hide LG., Elliott S.T. The ultrasound appearances of scrotal oedema // Eur. J. Ultrasound. 1998. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 33—37.
  405. Malik A.M. et al. The spectrum of presentation and management of Fournier’s gangrene—an experience of 73 cases // J. Pak. Med. Assoc. 2010. Vol. 60, N 8. P. 617-619.
  406. Sorensen M.D. et al. Fournier’s gangrene: management and mortality predictors in a population based study // J. Urol. 2009. Vol. 182, N 6. P. 2742-2747.
  407. Levenson R.B., Singh A.K., Novelline R.A. Fournier gangrene: role of imaging // Radiographics. 2008. Vol. 28, N 2. P. 519-528.
  408. Rajan D.K., Scharer K.A. Radiology of Fournier’s gangrene // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1998. Vol. 170, N 1. P. 163-168.
  409. Hara Y. et al. Acute scrotum caused by Henoch-Schonlein purpura 11 Int. J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 11, N 7. P. 578-580.
  410. Swygert K.E. et al. Melanoma in situ involving an epidermal inclusion (infundibular) cyst // Am. J. Dermatopathol. 2007. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 564-565.
  411. Germaine P., Simerman L.P. Fibrous pseudotumor of the scrotum // J. Ultrasound Med. 2007. Vol. 26, N 1. P. 133-138.
  412. Seethala R.R. et al. Diffuse fibrous pseudotumor of the testicular tunics associated with an in flamed hydrocele //Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2003.Vol. 127, N 6. P. 742-744.
  413. Lowe EC. Squamous-cell carcinoma of the scrotum // Urol. Clin. North Am. 1992. Vol. 19, N 2. P. 397-405.
  414. Jones M.E. et al. Risk of congenital inguinal hernia in siblings: a record linkage study // Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 1998. Vol. 12, N 3. P. 288-296.
  415. Rescorla F.J. et al. The «other side» of pediatric hernias: the role of laparoscopy // Am. Surg. 1997.Vol. 63, N8. P. 690-693.
  416. Erez I. et al. Preoperative ultrasound and intraoperative findings of inguinal hernias in children: a prospective study of 642 children // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2002. Vol. 37, N 6. P. 865-868.
  417. Osifo O.D., Osaigbovo E.O. Congenital hydrocele: prevalence and outcome among male children who underwent neonatal circumcision in Benin City, Nigeria //J. Pediatr. Urol. 2008. Vol. 4, N3. P. 178-182.
  418. Wampler S.M., Llanes M. Common scrotal and testicular problems // Prim. Care. 2010. Vol. 37, N 3. P. 613-626.
  419. Mihmanli I. et al. Testicular size and vascular resistance before and after hydrocelectomy // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004. Vol. 183, N 5. P. 1379-1385.
  420. Garriga V. et al. US of the tunica vaginalis testis: anatomic relationships and pathologic conditions I/ Radiographics. 2009. Vol. 29, N 7. P. 2017-2032.
  421. SomekhE., Gorenstein A., Serour F. Acute epididymitis in boys: evidence of a post-infectious etiology // J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 171, N 1. P. 391—394, discussion 394.
  422. Bohm M.K., Gift T.L., Tao G. Patterns of single and multiple claims of epididymitis among young privately-insured males in the United States, 2001 to 2004// Sex. Transm. Dis. 2009. Vol. 36, N 8. P. 490-492.
  423. Adams C.E., Wald M. Risks and complications of vasectomy // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2009. Vol. 36, N 3. P. 331-336.
  424. Greek G. Vasectomy. A safe, effective, economical means of sterilization // Postgrad. Med. 2000. Vol. 108, N 2. P. 173-176, 179.
  425. Schwingl P.J., Guess H.A. Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy // Fertil. Steril. 2000. Vol. 73, N 5. P. 923-936.
  426. Akbar S.A. et al. Multimodality imaging of pa-ratesticular neoplasms and their rare mimics // Radiographics. 2003. Vol. 23, N 6. P. 1461— 1476.
  427. Aydin H. et al. Clear cell papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis and mesosalpinx: immunohistochemical differentiation from metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005. Vol. 29, N 4. P. 520-523.
  428. AlexanderJ.A., Lichtman J.B., Varma V.A. Ultrasound demonstration of a papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1991. Vol. 19, N 7. P. 442-445.
  429. Salm R. Papillary sarcinoma of the epididymis // J. Pathol. 1969. Vol. 97, N 2. P. 253-259.
  430. Dowling K.J., Lieb H.E. Fibrosarcoma of epididymis // Urology. 1985. Vol. 26, N 3. P. 307-308.
  431. Kurihara K. et al. Papillary adenocarcinoma of the epididymis // Acta Pathol. Jpn. 1993. Vol. 43, N 7-8. P. 440-443.
  432. Ringdahl E., Teague L. Testicular torsion // Am. Fam. Physician. 2006. Vol. 74, N 10. P. 1739-1743.
  433. Bartsch G. et al. Testicular torsion: late results with special regard to fertility and endocrine function // J. Urol. 1980. Vol. 124, N 3. P. 375-378.
  434. Waldert M. et al. Color Doppler sonography reliably identifies testicular torsion in boys // Urology. 2010. Vol. 75, N 5. P. 1170-1174.
  435. Jee W.H. et al. Resistive index of the intrascrotal artery in scrotal inflammatory disease // Acta Radiol. 1997. Vol. 38, N 6. P. 1026-1030.
  436. Yagil Y. et al. Role of Doppler ultrasonography in the triage of acute scrotum in the emergency department // J. Ultrasound Med. 2010. Vol. 29, N 1. P. 11-21.
  437. NakagawaA. et al. In vivo analysis of phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by testicular Sertoli cells I/ Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2005. Vol. 71, N 2. P. 166-177.
  438. Drut R., Drut R.M. Testicular microlithiasis: histologic and immunohistochemical findings in 11 pediatric cases // Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2002. Vol. 5, N 6. P. 544-550.
  439. van Casteren NJ., Looijenga L.H., Dohle G.R. Testicular microlithiasis and carcinoma in situ overview and proposed clinical guideline // Int. J. Androl. 2009. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 279-287.
  440. Dagash H., Mackinnon E.A. Testicular microlithiasis: what does it mean clinically? // BJU Int. 2007. Vol. 99, N 1. P. 157-160.
  441. Middleton W.D., TeefeyS.A., Santillan C.S. Testicular microlithiasis: prospective analysis of prevalence and associated tumor // Radiology. 2002. Vol. 224, N 2. P. 425-428.
  442. Goede J. et al. Prevalence of testicular microlithiasis in asymptomatic males 0 to 19 years old // J. Urol. 2009. Vol. 182, N 4. P. 1516— 1520.
  443. von Eckardstein S. et al. Sonographic testicular microlithiasis as an indicator of premalig-nant conditions in normal and infertile men // J. Androl. 2001. Vol. 22, N 5. P. 818-824.
  444. DeCastro B.J., Peterson A.C., Costabile R.A. A 5-year follow-up study of asymptomatic men with testicular microlithiasis // J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 179, N 4. P. 1420-1423; discussion 1423.
  445. Kocaoglu M. et al. Testicular microlithiasis in pediatric age group: ultrasonography findings and literature review // Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2005. Vol. 11, N 1. P. 60-65.
  446. Furness P.D. 3rd et al. Multi-institutional study of testicular microlithiasis in childhood: a benign or premalignant condition? // J. Urol. 1998.Vol. 160. N 3. Pt 2. P. 1151-1154; discussion 1178.
  447. Frush D.P., Kliewer M.A., Madden J.F. Testicular microlithiasis and subsequent development of meta-static germ cell tumor // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1996. Vol. 167, N 4. P. 889-890.
  448. Bennett H.F. et al. Testicular microlithiasis: US follow-up U Radiology. 2001. Vol. 218, N 2. P. 359-363.
  449. Dieckmann K.P., Skakkebaek N.E. Carcinoma in situ of the testis: review of biological and clinical features// Int. J. Cancer. 1999. Vol. 83, N 6. P. 815-822.
  450. Husmann D.A. Cryptorchidism and its relationship to testicular neoplasia and microlithiasis 11 Urology. 2005. Vol. 66, N 2. P. 424— 426.
  451. Comiter C.V. et al. Burned-out primary testicular cancer: sonographic and pathological characteristics // J. Urol. 1996. Vol. 156, N 1. P. 85-88.
  452. Angulo J.C. et al. Clinicopathological study of regressed testicular tumors (apparent ex-tragonadal germ cell neoplasms) // J. Urol. 2009.Vol. 182, N 5. P. 2303-2310.
  453. Gooding G.A., Leonhardt W., Stein R. Testicular cysts: US findings // Radiology. 1987. Vol. 163, N 2. P. 537-538.
  454. Hamm B., FobbeF., LoyV. Testicular cysts: differentiation with US and clinical findings // Radiology. 1988. Vol. 168, N 1. P. 19-23.
  455. Dogra VS. et al. Benign intratesticular cystic lesions: US features // Radiographics. 2001. Vol. 21. Spec No. P. S273-S281.
  456. Carver B.S., Al-Ahmadie H., Sheinfeld J. Adult and pediatric testicular teratoma // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2007. Vol. 34, N 2. P. 245-251; abstract x.
  457. Chou S.J. et al. Cysts of the tunica albuginea // Arch. Androl. 2004. Vol. 50, N 2. P. 89-92.
  458. TammelaT.L. et al. Cysts of the tunica albuginea — more common testicular masses than previously thought? // Br. J. Urol. 1991. Vol. 68, N 3. P. 280-284.
  459. Khalid M. et al. Concomitant bilateral testicular epidermoid cysts // Saudi Med. J. 2008. Vol. 29, N 6. P. 907-909.
  460. Dogra V.S. et al. Testicular epidermoid cysts: sonographic features with histopathologic correlation // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2001. Vol. 29, N 3. P. 192-196.
  461. Malvica R.P. Epidermoid cyst of the testicle: an unusual sonographic finding // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1993. Vol. 160, N 5. P. 1047— 1048.
  462. Loya A.G., Said J.W., Grant E.G. Epidermoid cyst of the testis: radiologic-pathologic correlation // Radiographics. 2004. Vol. 24, suppl. 1. P. S243-S246.
  463. Nistal M., Mate A., Paniagua R. Cystic transformation of the rete testis // Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1996. Vol. 20, N 10. P. 1231-1239.
  464. Nair R. et al. Tubular ectasia of the rete testis: a diagnostic dilemma // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2008. Vol. 90, N 7. P. W1-W3.
  465. Bree R.L., Hoang D.T. Scrotal ultrasound // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 1996. Vol. 34, N 6. P. 1183-1205.
  466. Atasoy C., Fitoz S. Gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings in intratesticular varicocele //J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2001. Vol. 29, N 7. P. 369-373.
  467. Bucci S. et al. Intratesticular varicocele: evaluation using gray scale and color Doppler ultrasound // World J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 26, N 1. P. 87-89.
  468. Kessler A. et al. Intratesticular varicocele: gray scale and color Doppler sonographic appearance // J. Ultrasound Med. 2005. Vol. 24, N 12. P. 1711-1716.
  469. Das K.M. et al. Intratesticular varicocele: evaluation using conventional and Doppler sonography /1 AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 1999. Vol. 173, N4. P. 1079-1083.
  470. Desai K.M., GingellJ.C., Haworth J.M. Localised intratesticular abscess complicating epididymo-orchitis: the use of scrotal ultrasonography in diagnosis and management // Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.). 1986. Vol. 292, N 6532. P. 1361-1362.
  471. Mouritsen A. et al. Testicular adrenal rest tumours in boys, adolescents and adult men with congenital adrenal hyperplasia may be associated with the CYP21A2 mutation // Int. J. Androl. 2010. Vol. 33, N 3. P. 521-527.
  472. Claahsen-van der Grinten H.L. et al. Prevalence of testicular adrenal rest tumours in male children with congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency // Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2007. Vol. 157, N 3. P. 339— 344.
  473. Dogra V, Nathan J., BhattS. Sonographic appearance of testicular adrenal rest tissue in congenital adrenal hyperplasia //J. Ultrasound Med. 2004. Vol. 23, N 7. P. 979-981.
  474. Proto G. et al. Bilateral testicular adrenal rest tissue in congenital adrenal hyperplasia: US and MR features //J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2001. Vol. 24, N 7. P. 529-531.
  475. Dieckmann K.P. et al. Bilateral testicular germ cell tumors. Report of nine cases and review of the literature // Cancer. 1986. Vol. 57, N 6. P. 1254-1258.
  476. Datta S.N. et al. A case of scrotal sarcoidosis that mimicked tuberculosis // Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 2007. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 227-230.
  477. Metcalfe P.D. et al. Pediatric testicular tumors: contemporary incidence and efficacy of testicular preserving surgery // J. Urol. 2003. Vol. 170, N 6. Pt 1. Р. 2412—5241; discussion 2415-2416.
  478. Horwich A., Shipley J., Huddart R. Testicular germ-cell cancer // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 367, N 9512. P. 754-765.
  479. Schwerk W.B., Schwerk W.N., Rodeck G. Testicular tumors: prospective analysis of realtime US patterns and abdominal staging // Radiology. 1987. Vol. 164, N 2. P. 369-374.
  480. Woodward P.J. et al. From the archives of the AFIP: tumors and tumor-like lesions of the testis: radiologic-pathologic correlation // Radiographics. 2002. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 189—216.
  481. Shah A. et al. Re: new ultrasound techniques for imaging of the indeterminate testicular lesion may avoid surgery completely // Clin. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 65, N 6. P. 496-497.
  482. Frush D.P., Sheldon C.A. Diagnostic imaging for pediatric scrotal disorders // Radiographics. 1998. Vol. 18, N 4. P. 969-985.
  483. UlbrightT.M., Roth L.M. Recent developments in the pathology of germ cell tumors // Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 1987. Vol. 4, N 4. P. 304-319.
  484. ThavaV, Cooper N., Egginton J.A. Yolk sac tumour of the testis in childhood // Br. J. Radiol. 1992. Vol. 65, N 780. P. 1142-1144.
  485. Hasselblom S. et al. Testicular lymphoma — a retrospective, population-based, clinical and immunohistochemical study // Acta Oncol. 2004.Vol. 43, N 8. P. 758-765.
  486. Vural F. et al. Primary testicular lymphoma // J. Natl Med. Assoc. 2007. Vol. 99, N 11. P. 1277-1282.
  487. Zucca E. et al. Patterns of outcome and prognostic factors in primary large-cell lymphoma of the testis in a survey by the International Ex-tranodal Lymphoma Study Group // J. Clin. Oncol. 2003. Vol. 21, N 1. P. 20-27.
  488. Carmignani L. et al. High incidence of benign testicular neoplasms diagnosed by ultrasound//J. Urol. 2003. Vol. 170, N 5. P. 1783— 1786.
  489. Muller T. et al. Management of incidental impalpable intratesticular masses of <or = 5 mm in diameter // BJU Int. 2006. Vol. 98, N 5. P. 1001-1004.
  490. Hallak J. et al. Organ-sparing microsurgical resection of incidental testicular tumors plus microdissection for sperm extraction and cryopreservation in azoospermic patients: surgical aspects and technical refinements // Urology. 2009. Vol. 73, N 4. P. 887-891, discussion 891-892.
  491. Toren P.J. et al. Small incidentally discovered testicular masses in infertile men — is active surveillance the new standard of care? // J. Urol. 2010. Vol. 183, N 4. P. 1373-137.
  492. Lefort C. et al. [Ischemic orchiditis: review of 5 cases diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasonography] // J. Radiol. 2001. Vol. 82, N 7. P. 839-842.
  493. TarhanS. et al. Long-term effect of micro-surgical inguinal varicocelectomy on testicular blood flow // J. Androl. 2011. Vol. 32, N 1. P. 33-39.
  494. ShaflkA. et al. Testicular veins: anatomy and role in varicocelogenesis and other pathologic conditions /I Urology. 1990. Vol. 35, N 2. P. 175-182.
  495. Gat Y. et al. Induction of spermatogenesis in azoospermic men after internal spermatic vein embolization for the treatment of varicocele // Hum. Reprod. 2005. Vol. 20, N 4. P. 1013-1017.
  496. Gat Y. et al. Varicocele, hypoxia and male infertility. Fluid Mechanics analysis of the impaired testicular venous drainage system // Hum. Reprod. 2005. Vol. 20, N 9. P. 2614— 2619.
  497. Wishahi M.M. Anatomy of the spermatic venous plexus (pampiniform plexus) in men with and without varicocele: intraoperative veno-graphic study // J. Urol. 1992. Vol. 147, N 5. P. 1285-1289.
  498. Braedel H.U. et al. A possible ontogenic etiology for idiopathic left varicocele // J. Urol. 1994.Vol. 151, N 1. P. 62-66.
  499. Gorenstein A., KatzS., Schiller M. Varicocele in children: «to treat or not to treat» — veno-graphic and manometric studies // J. Pediatr. Surg. 1986. Vol. 21, N 12. P. 1046-1050.
  500. lafrate M. et al. Varicocele is associated with an increase of connective tissue of the pampiniform plexus vein wall // World J. Urol. 2009. Vol. 27, N 3. P. 363-369.
  501. The influence of varicocele on parameters of fertility in a large group of men presenting to infertility clinics. World Health Organization // Fertil. Steril. 1992. Vol. 57, N 6. P. 1289— 1293.
  502. BenoffS., Gilbert B.R. Varicocele and male infertility: part I. Preface // Hum. Reprod. Update. 2001. Vol. 7, N 1. P. 47-54.
  503. Robinson S.P., Hampton L.J., Koo H.P. Treatment strategy for the adolescent varicocele // Urol. Clin. North Am. 2010. Vol. 37, N 2. P. 269-278.
  504. Cornud Е et al. Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment // Eur. Radiol. 1999. Vol. 9, N 3. P. 536-545.
  505. Tasci A.I. et al. Color Doppler ultrasonography and spectral analysis of venous flow in diagnosis of varicocele // Eur. Urol. 2001. Vol. 39, N 3. P. 316-321.
  506. Kadyrov Z.A. et al. | Bilateral varicocele: epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis] // Urologiia. 2007. Vol. 3. P. 64-68.
  507. Gat Y. et al. Physical examination may miss the diagnosis of bilateral varicocele: a comparative study of 4 diagnostic modalities // J. Urol. 2004. Vol. 172, N 4. Pt 1. P. 1414-1417.
  508. Akcar N. et al. Intratesticular arterial resistance and testicular volume in infertile men with sub-clinical varicocele//J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2004. Vol. 32, N 8. P. 389-393.
  509. Donkol R.H. Imaging in male-factor obstructive infertility // World J. Radiol. 2010. Vol. 2, N 5. P. 172-179.
  510. Honig S.C., Lipshultz L.E, Jarow J. Significant medical pathology uncovered by a comprehensive male infertility evaluation // Fertil. Steril. 1994. Vol. 62, N 5. P. 1028-1034.
  511. McCallum T. et al. Unilateral renal agenesis associated with congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens: phenotypic findings and genetic considerations // Hum. Reprod. 2001. Vol. 16, N 2. P. 282-288.
  512. Romeo C. et al. Altered serum inhibin b levels in adolescents with varicocele // J. Pediatr. Surg. 2007. Vol. 42, N 2. P. 390-394.
  513. Ozden C. et al. Effect of varicocelectomy on serum inhibin В levels in infertile patients with varicocele // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2008. Vol. 42, N5. P. 441-443.
  514. Sakamoto H. et al. Effects of varicocele repair in adults on ultrasonographically determined testicular volume and on semen profile // Urology. 2008. Vol. 71, N 3. P. 485-489.
  515. Zucchi A. et al. Varicocele and fertility: relationship between testicular volume and seminal parameters before and after treatment // J. Androl. 2006. Vol. 27, N 4. P. 548-551.
  516. Evers J.H., Collins J., Clarke J. Surgery or embolisation for varicoceles in subfertile men // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009. Issue 1: CD000479.
  517. Schlegel P.N., Su L.M. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction // Hum. Reprod. 1997. Vol. 12, N 8. P. 1688-1692.
  518. Gilbert B.R., Witkin S.S., Goldstein M. Correlation of sperm-bound immunoglobulins with impaired semen analysis in infertile men with varicoceles // Fertil. Steril. 1989. Vol. 52, N 3. P. 469-473.
  519. Sinisi A.A. et al. Prevalence of antisperm antibodies by SpermMARtest in subjects undergoing a routine sperm analysis for infertility // Int. J. Androl. 1993. Vol. 16, N 5. P. 311-314.
  520. Urry R.L. et al. The incidence of antisperm antibodies in infertility patients with a history of cryptorchidism // J. Urol. 1994. Vol. 151, N 2. P. 381-383.
  521. Heidenreich A. et al. Risk factors for antisperm antibodies in infertile men // Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1994. Vol. 31, N 2-3. P. 69-76.
  522. Zini A. et al. Anti-sperm antibody levels are not related to fertilization or pregnancy rates after IVFor IVF/ICSI //J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011. Vol. 88, N 1. P. 80-84.
  523. Deurdulian C. et al. US of acute scrotal trauma: optimal technique, imaging findings, and management // Radiographics. 2007. Vol. 27, N 2. P. 357-369.
  524. Cubillos J. et al. A conservative approach to testicular rupture in adolescent boys // J. Urol. 2010.Vol. 184. N 4. Suppl. P. 1733-1738.
  525. Bhatt S., Dogra VS. Role of US in testicular and scrotal trauma // Radiographics. 2008. Vol. 28, N6. P. 1617-1629.
  526. Buckley J.C., McAninchJ.W. Use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of testicular injuries in blunt scrotal trauma // J. Urol. 2006. Vol. 175, N 1. P. 175-178.
  527. Guichard G. et al. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of testicular rupture after blunt scrotal trauma // Urology. 2008. Vol. 71, N 1. P. 52-56.
  528. Kim S.H. et al. The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of testicular rupture: a prospective preliminary study // J. Trauma. 2009. Vol. 66, N 1. P. 239-242.
  529. Chandra R.V. et al. Rational approach to diagnosis and management of blunt scrotal trauma // Urology. 2007. Vol. 70, N 2. P. 230-234.
  530. Surange R.S., Jeygopal N.S., ChowdhuryS.D., Sharma N.K. Bedside ultrasound: a useful tool for the on-call urologist? // Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2001. Vol. 32, N4. P. 591-596.
  531. Datta S.N., Allen G.M., Evans R., Vaugh-ton K.C., Lucas M.G. Urinary tract ultrasonography in the evaluation of haematuria — a report of over 1000 cases // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2002. Vol. 84, N 3. P. 203-205.
  532. Al UM Practice Guidelines, Ultrasound in the practice of urology. 2011.
  533. American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline: diagnosis, evaluation and followup of asymptomatic microhematuria (АМН) in adults: AUA Guideline. 2012.
  534. American Urological Association (AUA) Guideline: clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. 2012.
  535. Wein A. Campbell-Walsh Urology. Vol. 1. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2009.
  536. Emamian S.A., Nielsen M.B., Pedersen J.F., Ytte L. Kidney dimensions at sonography: correlation with age, sex, and habitus in 665 adult volunteers // Am. J. Roentgenol. 1993. Vol. 160, N 1. P. 83-86.
  537. Han B.K., Babcock D.S. Sonographic measurements and appearance of normal kidneys in children // Am. J. Roentgenol. 1985. Vol. 145, N3.P. 611-616.
  538. Adam A., editor. Grainger and Allison’s Diagnostic Radiology. N 1. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2008.
  539. Moghazi S., Jones E., Schroepple J. et al. Correlation of renal histopathology with sonographic findings // Kidney Int. 2005. Vol. 67, N4. P. 1515-1520.
  540. Shokeir A.A., Abdulmaaboud M. Resistive index in renal colic: a prospective study // BJU Int. 1999. Vol. 83, N 4. P. 378-382.
  541. Rawashdeh Y.F., Djurhuus J.C., Mortensen J., Horlyck A. et al. The intrarenal resistive index as a pathophysiological marker of obstructive uropathy // J. Urol. 2001. Vol. 165, N 5. P. 1397-1404.
  542. Shokeir A.A., Abdulmaaboud M. Prospective comparison of nonenhanced helical computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of renal colic // J. Urol. 2001. Vol. 165, N4. P. 1082-1084.
  543. Horrigan T.J., Reese C.S., Panes J.A., Clarke H.S. et al. A study of resistive indices in the arcuate arteries of the kidney over the course of gestation // J. Perinatol. 1996. Vol. 16, N 6. P. 467-469.
  544. Platt J.E, Rubin J.M., Ellis J.H. Acute renal obstruction: evaluation with intrarenal duplex Doppler and conventional US // Radiology. 1993. Vo. 186, N 3. P. 685-688.
  545. AndreoiuM., MacMahon R. Renal colic in pregnancy: lithiasis or physiological hydronephrosis? // Urology. 2009. Vol. 74, N 4. P. 757-761.
  546. Shokeir A.A., Mahran M.R., Abdulmaaboud M. Renal colic in pregnant women: role of renal resistive index // Urology. 2000. Vol. 55, N 3. P. 344-347.
  547. Tublin M.E., Bude R.O., Platt J.F. Review. The resistive index in renal Doppler sonography: where do we stand? // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2003. Vol. 180, N 4. P. 885-892.
  548. Bosniak M.A. The current radiological approach to renal cysts // Radiology. 1986. Vol. 158, N 1. P. 1-10.
  549. Israel G.M., Bosniak M.A. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system // Urology. 2005. Vol. 66. P. 484-488.
  550. Shathabish S. A longitudinal study of kidney structure and function in adults // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010. Vol. 25, N 4. P. 1120— 1126.
  551. Gourtsoyiannis N., Prassopoulos P., Cavouras D., Pantelidis N. The thickness of the renal parenchyma decreases with age: a CT study of 360 patients // Am. J. Roentgenol. 1990. Vol. 155, N 3. P. 541-544.
  552. Akpinarl.N., Altun E., AvcuS., TuneyD. et al. Sonographic measurement of kidney size in geriatric patients // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 2003. Vol. 31, N 6. P. 315-318.
  553. Berrington de Gonzalez A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P. et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007 // Arch. Intern. Med. 2009. Vol. 169, N 22. P. 2071-2077.
  554. Smith-Bindman R., Lipson J., Marcus R. et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer //Arch. Intern. Med. 2009. Vol. 169, N 22. P. 2078-2086.
  555. Smith-Bindman R. Is computed tomography safe? // N. Engl. J. Med. 2010. Vol. 363, N 1. P. 1-4.
  556. Patlas M., Farkas A., Fisher D., Zaghal I. et al. Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic // Br. J. Radiol. 2001. Vol. 74, N 886. P. 901-904.
  557. Sheafor D.H., Hertzberg B.S., Freed K.S. et al. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison // Radiology. 2000. Vol. 217, N 3. P. 792-797.
  558. RipollesT., Agramunt M., ErrandoJ., Martinez M.J. et al. Suspected ureteral colic: plain fi Im and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients // Eur. Radiol. 2004. Vol. 14, N 1. P. 129-136.
  559. de Souza L.R., Goldman S.M., Faintuch S. et al. Comparison between ultrasound and noncontrast helical computed tomography for identification of acute ureterolithiasis in a teaching hospital setting // Sao Paulo Med. J. Revista Paulista de Medicina. 2007. Vol. 125, N 2. P. 102-107.
  560. Katz S.I., Saluja S., Brink J.A., Forman H.P. Radiation dose associated with unenhanced CT for suspected renal colic: impact of repetitive studies // Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006. Vol. 186, N4. P. 1120-1124.
  561. AUA Guideline: clinical effectiveness protocols for imaging in the management of ureteral calculous disease: AUA technology assessment. 2013 Ellenbogen P.H., Scheible F.W., TalnerL.B., Leopold G.R. Sensitivity of gray scale ultrasound in detecting urinary tract obstruction // Am. J. Roentgenol. 1978. Vol. 130. P. 731-733. Manger J.P., Mendoza P.J., Babayan R.K., Wang D.S. Use of renal ultrasound to detect hydronephrosis after ureteroscopy //J. Endourol. 2009. Vol. 23, N 9. P. 1399-1402.
  562. Fernbach S.K., MaizelsM., Conway J.J. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology // Pediatr. Radiol. 1993. Vol. 23. P. 478.
  563. O’Neill Charles W. Atlas of Renal Ultrasonography. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 2001. P. 43, 47.
  564. Guidance for industry and FDA staff-information for manufacturers seeking marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers. Document issued on 9 Sept 2008.
  565. Bioeffects Committee of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine consensus report on potential bioeffects of diagnostic ultrasound: executive summary // J. Ultrasound Med. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 503-515.
  566. Susani M., Madersbacher S., Kratzik C., Vingers L. et al. Morphology of tissue destruction induced by focused ultrasound // Eur. Urol. 1993. Vol. 23, suppl. 1. P. 34-38.
  567. Rumack С.М., Wilson S.R., Charboneau J.W. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. Ch. 2. P. 37.
  568. O’Brien W.D., Deng C.S., Harris G.R., Herman B.A. et al. The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: thermal effects I/ J. Ultrasound Med. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 517-535.
  569. Church C.C., Carstensen E.L., NyborgW.L., Carson P.L. et al. The risk of exposure to diagnostic ultrasound in postnatal subjects: nonthermal mechanisms // J. Ultrasound Med. 2008. Vol. 27. P. 565-592.
  570. Nelson T.R., Fowlkes J. B., Abramowicz J.S., Church C.C. Ultrasound biosafety considerations for the practicing sonographer and sinologist //J. Ultrasound Med. 2009. Vol. 18. P. 139-50.
  571. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. How to interpret the ultrasound output display standard for higher acoustic output diagnostic ultrasound devices: version 2 [technical bulletin] // J. Ultrasound Med. 2004. Vol. 23. P. 723-726.
  572. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Official Statement on Prudent Use Clinical Safety. April 2012.
  573. United States Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Hospital eTool, Clinical services sonography.
  574. Makary M.A., Epstein J., Pronovost P.J., Millman E.A. et al. Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care // Surgery. 2007. Vol. 141, N 4. P. 450-455.
  575. Routine quality assurance for diagnostic ultrasound equipment. Published by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine; 2008.
  576. Rutala W.A., Weber D.J. The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities; 2008.
  577. FDA public health notification: reprocessing of reusable ultrasound transducer assemblies used for biopsy procedures; 2006.
  578. AIUM Guidelines for Cleaning and Preparing Endocavitary Ultrasound Transducers Between Patients. Approved June 4, 2003.
  579. FDA-cleared sterilants and high level disinfectants with general claims for processing reusable medical and dental devices, March 2009.
  580. ANS1/AAMI ST58: 1005(R)2010. Chemical sterilization and high level disinfection in health care facilities. Developed by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. Approved by the American National Standards Institute.
  581. Mason W. P. Piezoelectricity, its history and applications // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1981. Vol. 70, N6. P. 1561-1566.
  582. Rumack C.M., Wilson S.R., Charboneau J.W. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2005. P. 8.
  583. Rumack C.M., Wilson S.R., Charboneau J.W. Diagnostic ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2005. P. 12.
  584. Rubin J.M., Bude R.O., Carson P.L. et al. Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US // Radiology. 1994. Vol. 190. P. 853— 856.
  585. Rifkin M.D., Cochlin D.L. Imaging of the Scrotum and Penis. London: Martin Dunitz, 2002. P. 276.
  586. Zucchelli P.C. Hypertension and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: diagnostic approach // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 13. P. S184-S186.
  587. Bluth E.I., Benson С.В., Ralls P.W. Ultrasonography in Vascular Diseases: a practical Approach to Clinical Problems. N.Y.: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2008. P. 87.
  588. Kim H.C., Yang D.M., Jin W., Ryu J.K., Shin H.C. Color Doppler twinkling artifacts in various conditions during abdominal and pelvic sonography // J. Ultrasound Med. 2010. Vol. 29. P. 621-632.
  589. Merritt C.R. Technology update // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2001. Vol. 39. P. 385-397.
  590. Ghani K.R., Pilcher J., Patel U. et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound reconstruction of the pelvicaliceal system: an in-vitro study // World J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 26. P. 493-498.
  591. Mitterberger M., Pinggera G.M., Pallwein L. et al. The value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography in staging prostate cancer// BJU Int. 2007. Vol. 100. P. 47-50.
  592. Mitterberger M., Pinggera G.M., HomingerW. et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 178. P. 464-468.
  593. Mason W. P. Piezoelectricity, its history and applications // J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1981. Vol. 70, N6. P. 1561-1566.
  594. Rumack C.M., Wilson S.R., Charboneau J.W. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2005. P. 8.
  595. Rumack C.M., Wilson S.R., Charboneau J.W. Diagnostic ultrasound. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2005. P. 12.
  596. Rubin J.M., Bude R.O., Carson P.L. et al. Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US // Radiology. 1994. Vol. 190. P. 853— 856.
  597. Rifkin M.D., Cochlin D.L. Imaging of the Scrotum and Penis. London: Martin Dunitz, 2002. P. 276.
  598. Zucchelli P.C. Hypertension and atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: diagnostic approach // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002. Vol. 13. P. S184-S186.
  599. Bluth E.I., Benson С.В., Ralls P.W. Ultrasonography in Vascular Diseases: a practical Approach to Clinical Problems. N.Y.: Thieme Medical Publishers, 2008. P. 87.
  600. Kim H.C., Yang D.M., Jin W., Ryu J.K., Shin H.C. Color Doppler twinkling artifacts in various conditions during abdominal and pelvic sonography // J. Ultrasound Med. 2010. Vol. 29. P. 621-632.
  601. Merritt C.R. Technology update // Radiol. Clin. North Am. 2001. Vol. 39. P. 385-397.
  602. Ghani K.R., Pilcher J., Patel U. et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound reconstruction of the pelvicaliceal system: an in-vitro study // World J. Urol. 2008. Vol. 26. P. 493-498.
  603. Mitterberger M., Pinggera G.M., Pallwein L. et al. The value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography in staging prostate cancer// BJU Int. 2007. Vol. 100. P. 47-50.
  604. Mitterberger M., Pinggera G.M., HomingerW. et al. Comparison of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted biopsy to conventional systematic biopsy: impact on Gleason score // J. Urol. 2007. Vol. 178. P. 464-468.
  605. Corcoran A.J., Barber J.R., Conner W.E. Tiger moth jams bat sonar // Science. 2009. Vol. 325, N 5938. P. 325-327.
  606. Dunning D.C., Roeder K. D. Moth sounds and the insect-catching behavior of bats // Science. 1965. Vol. 147. P. 173-174.
  607. Mackay R.L., Liaw H.M. Dolphin vocalization mechanisms // Science. 1981. Vol. 212, N 4495. P. 676-678.
  608. Ruttimann J. Frogs chat in ultrasound // Nature News. 2006 Mar 15.
  609. Galambos R. The avoidance of obstacles by flying bats: Spallazani’s ideas (1794) and later theories// Isis. 1942. Vol. 34, N 2. P. 132-140.
  610. DijkgraafS. Spallanzani’s unpublished experiments on the sensory basis of object perception in bats// Isis. 1960. Vol. 51, N 1. P. 9-20.
  611. Curie J., Curie P. Sur 1’electricite polaire dans cristaux hemiedres a face inclinees // C. R. Seances Acad. Sci. 1880. Vol. 91. P. 383.
  612. KatzirS. The discovery of the piezoelectric effect // The beginnings of piezoelectricity: a study in Mundane Physics / ed. S. Katzir. Netherlands: Springer, 2006. P. 15—64.
  613. Curie P. Radioactive substances, especially radium // Nobel Lecture, 6 Jun 1905.
  614. Diamantis A., Magiorkinis E., Papadimitriou A., Androutsos G. The contribution of Maria Sklodowska-Curie and Pierre Curie to Nuclear and Medical Physics. A hundred and ten years after the discovery of radium // Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 2008. Vol. 11, N 1. P. 33-38.
  615. Seitz F. The cosmic inventor: Reginald Aubrey Fessenden (1866—1932) // Am. Philos. Soc. 1999. Vol. 89. P. 41-46.
  616. Chilowsky C., Langevin M.P. Procedes et appareils pour la production de signaux sousmarins diriges et pour la localisation a distance d’obstacles sous-marins; French patent #502913, 1916.
  617. Martin J. History of ultrasound // Ultrasound in Urology / eds R.C. Sanders, M. Resnick. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins. 1984. P. 1-12.
  618. Zimmerman D. Paul Langevin and the discovery of active sonar or Asdic // North Mariner. 2002. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 39-52.
  619. Sokolov S.Y. The ultra-acoustic microscope // Zh. Tekh. Fiz. 1949. Vol. 19. P. 271.
  620. Jagannathan J. et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound surgery of the brain: part 1-a historical perspective with modern applications // Neurosurgery. 2009. Vol. 64. N 2. P. 201-210, discussion 210—211.
  621. Dussik K. Uber die Moglichkeit, hochfre-quente mechanische Schwingungen als diag-nostische Mittel zu verwerten // Z. Ges. Neurol. Psych. 1941. Vol. 174. P. 153-168.
  622. Thomas A.M.K., Banerjee A.K., Busch U. Uber die Moglichkeit, hochfrequente mechanische Schwingungen als diagnostische Mittel zu verwerten // Classic Papers in Modern Diagnostic Radiology / eds A.K. Banerjee, A.M.K. Thomas, U. Busch. Berlin: Springer, 2005. P. 141-161.
  623. Shampo M.A., Kyle R.A. Karl Theodore Dussik — pioneer in ultrasound // Mayo Clin. Proc. 1995. Vol. 70, N 12. P. 1136.
  624. Thomas A.M.K., Banerjee A.K., Busch U. Application of echo-ranging techniques to the determination of structure of biological tissues // Classic Papers in Modem Diagnostic Radiology / eds A.K. Banerjee, A.M.K. Thomas, U. Busch. Berlin: Springer, 2005. P. 162-169.
  625. Wild J.J., Reid J.M. Application of echo-ranging techniques to the determination of structure of biological tissues // Science. 1952. Vol. 115, N 2983. P. 226-230.
  626. Edler L, Hertz C.H. The use of ultrasonic re-flectoscope for the continuous recording of the movements of heart walls. 1954 // Clin. Physiol. Fund. Imaging. 2004. Vol. 24, N 3. P. 118-136.
  627. Fraser A.G. Inge Edler and the origins of clinical echocardiography // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2001. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 3-5.
  628. Holmes J.H. et al. The ultrasonic visualization of soft tissue structures in the human body // Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 1954. Vol. 66. P. 208-225.
  629. Donald I., Macvicar J., Brown T.G. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound//Lancet. 1958. Vol. 1.N7032. P. 1188-1195.
  630. Thomas A.M.K., Banerjee A.K., Busch U. Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound // Classic Papers in Modern Diagnostic Radiology / eds A.K. Banerjee, A.M.K.. Thomas, U. Busch. Berlin : Springer, 2005. P. 213-223.
  631. Doppler C. Uber das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestime des Himmels // Abh. Konigl. Bohm. Ges Wiss. 1843. Bd 2. S. 465-482.
  632. Satomura S. Ultrasonic Doppler method for the inspection of cardiac function //J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 1957. Vol. 29. P. 1181-1185.
  633. Coman I.M. Christian Andreas Doppler — the man and his legacy // Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2005. Vol. 6, N 1. P. 7-10.
  634. Hofmann D., Hollander H.J. Intrauterine diagnosis of hydrops fetus universalis using ultrasound // Zentralbl. Gynakol. 1968. Vol. 90, N 19. P. 667-669.
  635. Woo J. A short history of the development of ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology.
  636. Bernstine R. L., Callagan D.A. Ultrasonic Doppler inspection of the fetal heart // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1966. Vol. 95, N 7. P. 1001 — 1004.
  637. Buschmann W. On the diagnosis of carotid thrombosis // Albrecht Von Graefes Arch. Ophthalmol. 1964. Vol. 166. P. 519-529.
  638. Brinker R.A., LandissD.J., CroleyT.F. Detection of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Preliminary report // J. Neurosurg. 1968. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 143— 148.
  639. Grossman B.L., Wood E.H. Evaluation of cerebrovascular disease utilizing a transcutaneous Doppler technic // Radiology. 1968. Vol. 90, N 3. P. 586-758.
  640. Strandness D. Jr. Ultrasonic velocity determination in the diagnosis and evaluation of peripheral vascular disease // Symposium on Ultrasound. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1968.
  641. Maroon J.C., Campbell R.L., Dyken M.L. Internal carotid artery occlusion diagnosed by Doppler ultrasound // Stroke. 1970. Vol. 1, N2. P. 122-127.
  642. Kato K., Izumi T. A new ultrasonic flowmeter that can detect flow direction // Proceedings of the 10th scientific meeting of the Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine. Springer, 1966. P. 78-79.
  643. McLeod F. A directional Doppler flowmeter // Digest of the 7th international conference on medical electronics and biological engineering. Royal Academy of Engineering Sciences, 1967. P. 213.
  644. Bollinger A., Partsch H. Christian Doppler is 200 years young // Vasa. 2003. Vol. 32, N 4. P. 225-233.
  645. Baker D.W., Johnson S.L. Doppler echocar-diograpy//Cardiac Ultrasound/edsR.C. Waag, R. Gramiak. St. Louis: CV Mosby. 1974. P. 24.
  646. Maulik D. et al. Doppler color flow mapping of the fetal heart // Angiology. 1986. Vol. 37, N 9. P. 628-632.
  647. Hamper U.M. et al. Power Doppler imaging: clinical experience and correlation with color Doppler US and other imaging modalities // Radiographics. 1997. Vol. 17, N 2. P. 499-513.
  648. Sheikh K. et al. Real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography: feasibility and initial use // Echocardiography. 1991. Vol. 8, N 1. P. 119— 125.
  649. Takahashi H., Ouchi T. The ultrasonic diagnosis in the field of urology // Proc. Jpn Soc. Ultrasonics Med. 1963. Vol. 3. P. 7.
  650. Watanabe H. et al. Development and application of new equipment for transrectal ultrasonography // J. Clin. Ultrasound. 1974. Vol. 2, N 2. P. 91-98.
  651. Holm H.H., Northeved A. A transurethral ultrasonic scanner//J. Urol. 1974. Vol. Ill, N 2. P. 238-241.
  652. Goldberg B.B., Pollack H.M. Differentiation of renal masses using А-mode ultrasound // J. Urol. 1971. Vol. 105, N 6. P. 765-771.
  653. Perri A.J. et al. Necrotic testicle with increased blood flow on Doppler ultrasonic examination 11 Urology. 1976. Vol. 8, N 3. P. 265—267.
  654. Perri A.J. et al. The Doppler stethoscope and the diagnosis of the acute scrotum // J. Urol. 1976. Vol. 116, N 5. P. 598-600.
  655. Watanabe H. et al. Non-invasive detection of ultrasonic Doppler signals from renal vessels // Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 1976. Vol. 118, N 4. P. 393-394.
  656. Greene E.R. et al. Noninvasive characterization of renal artery blood flow // Kidney Int. 1981. Vol. 20, N 4. P. 523-529.
  657. Arima M. et al. Predictability of renal allograft prognosis during rejection crisis by ultrasonic Doppler flow technique // Urology. 1982. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 389-394.
  658. Burgess S.E. et al. Histologic changes in porcine eyes treated with high-intensity focused ultrasound I I Ann. Ophthalmol. 1987. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 133-138.
  659. Madersbacher S. et al. Tissue ablation in benign prostatic hyperplasia with high-intensity focused ultrasound // Eur. Urol. 1993. Vol. 23, suppl. 1. P. 39-43.
  660. Madersbacher S. et al. Transcutaneous high-intensity focused ultrasound and irradiation: an organ-preserving treatment of cancer in a solitary testis // Eur. Urol. 1998. Vol. 33, N 2. P. 195-201.
  661. ChapelonJ.Y. et al. Treatment of localised prostate cancer with transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound // Eur. J. Ultrasound. 1999. Vol. 9,N 1. P. 31-38.
  662. Berge V, BacoE., Karlsen S.J. A prospective study of salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound for locally radiorecurrent prostate cancer: early results // Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 2010. Vol. 44, N 4. P. 223-227.
  663. Kohrmann K.U. et al. High intensity focused ultrasound as noninvasive therapy for multilocal renal cell carcinoma: case study and review of the literature // J. Urol. 2002. Vol. 167, N 6. P. 2397-2403.
  664. Margreiter M., Marberger M. Focal therapy and imaging in prostate and kidney cancer: high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of small renal tumors // J. Endourol. 2010. Vol. 24, N 5. P. 745-748.
  665. Chen S.L. et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided trans-perineal botulinum toxin a injection to the external urethral sphincter for treatment of detrusor external sphincter dyssynergia in patients with spinal cord injury // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2010. Vol. 91, N 3. P. 340-344.
  666. Ozawa H. et al. The future of urodynamics: non-invasive ultrasound videourodynamics // Int. J. Urol. 2010. Vol. 17, N 3. P. 241-249.
  667. Chad Baxter, MD Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, CA, USA
  668. Akhil K. Das, MD, FACS Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  669. Majid Eshghi, MD, FACS, MBA Department of Urology, New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center,Valhalla, New York, NY, USA
  670. Farzeen Firoozi, MD Department of Urology, Hofstra Northshore—L1J School of Medicine, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, Center of Pelvic Health and Reconstructive Surgery, Lake Success, NY, USA
  671. Pat F. Fulgham, MD, FACS Department of Urology, Texas Health Presbyterian Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
  672. Bruce R. Gilbert, MD, PhD, FACS Hofstra North Shore LU School of Medicine, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
  673. Fernando J. Kim, MD, FACS Department of Surgery/Urology, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver Health Medical Center, Tony Grampsas Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA
  674. Xiaolong S. Liu, MD Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Kimmel Cancer Center, PA, USA
  675. Rao S. Mandalapu, MD Department of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Hospital, Elkins Park, PA, USA
  676. Lane S. Palmer, MD Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Cohen Children’s Medical Center of New York, Lake Success, NY, USA
  677. Christopher R. Porter, MD, FACS Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
  678. Soroush Rais-Bahrami, MD Hofstra North Shore LU School of Medicine, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
  679. Kyle Rove, MD Department of Urology, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Aurora, CO, USA
  680. Mostafa A. Sadek, MD Department of Urology, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
  681. David E. Sehrt, BS Department of Surgery/ Urology, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver Health Medical Center, Tony Grampsas Cancer Center, Denver, CO, USA
  682. Jennifer Simmons, MD Division of Urology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
  683. R. Ernest Sosa, MD Division of Urology, Veterans Administration Healthcare System, New York Harbor, Manhattan, NY, USA
  684. Peter N. Tiffany, MD Department of Urology, Winchester Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Stoneham, MA, USA
  685. Edouard J. Trabulsi, MD, FACS Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Kimmel Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  686. Nikhil Waingankar, MD North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System, The Arthur Smith Institute for Urology, New Hyde Park, NY, USA

В ходе подготовки статей данного раздела труды отечественных авторов не использовались.

- Вернуться в оглавление раздела "УЗИ"

Редактор: Искандер Милевски. Дата публикации: 30.6.2023