Список трудов авторов, использованных при подготовке статей по эндодонтии на сайте МедикалПланет

При подготовке статей по эндодонтии в стоматологии на сайте МедикалПланет использованы труды исключительно признанных зарубежных авторов:

  1. Antony LP, Grossman LI. Brief history of root canal treatment in the United States. J Am Dent Assoc. 1945;32(1):43-5O.
  2. Skillen VG. Morphology of root canals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1932:19:719.
  3. Grove CJ. A single acceptable procedure for trea~ent and filling of root canals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1930;17:293-296.
  4. Jasper EA. Root canal trea~ent in modern dentistry. Dent Cosmos. 1933;75:823-9.
  5. Ingle JI. The need for endodontic instrument standardization. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1955;8(ii):1211-3.
  6. Ingle JI, Levine M. The need for uniformity of endodontic instruments, equipment, and filling materials. Transaction of the Second International Conference on Endodontics, Philadelphia, 1958. pp. 123-42.
  7. Ingle JI. A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961;14(1):83-91.
  8. American National Standards Institute. Proposed ADA specification for root canal files and reamer. Seventh daft as amended, 1973.
  9. Council on Dental Materials and Devices. New American Dental Association specification N. 28 for endodontic files and reamers. J Am Dent Assoc. 1976;93:813-7.
  10. Germain LP. The structural and physical properties of endodontic instruments. Thesis, Boston University, 1981.
  11. Schilder H. For patient comfort and clinical success. Personal Communication. 46th Congress American Association of Endodontists, New Orleans, 1989.
  12. Schilder H. Revolutionary new concepts in endodontic instrument sizing. G It Endo. 1993:4:166.
  13. Craig RG, Peyton FA. Physical properties of carbon steel root canal files and reamer. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961
  14. Gallegos AG, Bertolotti RL. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on the strength of carbon steel endodontic instruments. J Endod. 198i;7(9):423-5.
  15. Craig RG, Peyton FA. Physical properties of stainless steel endodontic files and reamers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1963/
  16. Cantatore G. Preparazione canalare con strumenti meccaniciNi-Ti. Dental Cadmos (Dossier). 199612:11.
  17. Cantatore G. Evolution des techniques d’instrumentation canalaire. European Dental Magazine. Le Monde Dentaire 1998:87:11.
  18. Krell KV. Endodontic instruments. In: Walton RE, Torabinejad M (eds.) Principles and practice in endodontics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1989- P-149-
  19. Newman JC, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. A study of the cutting efficiency of seven brands of endodontic files in linear motion. J Endod. 1983.
  20. Glosson CR, Haller RH, Dove SB, et al A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and К-Flex endodontic instruments. J Endod. 1995/
  21. Glickman GN, Dumsha TC. Problems in canal cleaning and shaping. In: Gu”an JL, Dumsha TC, Lovdhal PE (eds) Problem solving in endodontics. Chicago: Year Book; 1988.
  22. Powell SE, Simon JHS, Maze BB. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod. 1986;12:293-300.
  23. Powell SE, Wong PD, Simon JHS. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod. i988;i4(5):224-8.
  24. Newman JC, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. A study of the cutting efficiency of seven brands of endodontic files in linear motion. J. Endod. 1983:9:136.
  25. Schafer E, Lohmann D. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster* instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-FlexoFile*. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int Endod J. 2002.
  26. Roane JB, Sabala CL, Duncan-son MG. The “Balanced Force” concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1985;ii(5):2O3-ii.
  27. Sepic AO, Pantera EA, Neaverth EJ, et al. A comparison of Flex-R and K-type files for enlargement of severely curved molar root canals. J Endod. 1989;15(6):24o-5.
  28. MlSERENDINO LJ, MOSER JB, HEUER MA. Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part 1: A quantitative comparison of the tip and fluted regions. J Endod. i985;(io)n:435-4i.
  29. Johnson WB. New technology in endodontics. Lecture during the Third World Conference on Endodontics IFEA, Rome, 1995-
  30. Buchanan LS. The predefined endodontic preparation: instrument and technique updates for the greater taper system. Dent Today. 200i;2o(i):56-6o.
  31. Buchanan LS. Innovations in endodontic instruments and techniques: how they simplify trea'ent. Dent Today. 2002;21(12):52-61.
  32. Endo-Eze AET. Brochure disponibile in: www.endoeze.com
  33. Senia ES. Lightspeed": More than just another instrument. Endodontic Practice 1998;1:17-23.
  34. Senia ES, Wildey WL. The lightspeed* instructional guide. Lightspeed* Technology, San Antonio, Texas, 2000.
  35. Green DD. The HERO 642’ System: A GDP’s experiences. Endodontic Practice 1999:11:36.
  36. Schafer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642* rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-FlexoFiles* in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(г):215-20.
  37. Vulcain JM, Calas P. The three wave concept of Hero 642*. Endodontic Practice. 1999;2:20-31.
  38. Bal S, Bourbon-Kerisit S. Du HERO 642* au HERO Shaper*. Le Monde Dentaire, European Dental Magazine. 2003:119:13.
  39. Calas P. Preparation canalaire en rotation continue: Le concept du “pas adapte”. L’ln-formation Dentaire. 2003;25:1753-61.
  40. Calas P. Etude d’un nouvel instrument de preparation canalaire en nickel-ti-tane: I’Endoflare*. Information Dentaire, 2003;6:331-8.
  41. Barnett F, Serota KS. The next level of Nickel-Titanium root canal preparation: Sybron Endo K3 rotary instrumentation. Oral Health. 2002;12:37-44.
  42. Yared G, Kulkarni K, Ghossayn F. An in vitro study of the torsional properties of new and used Kj instruments. Int Endod J. 2003.
  43. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle JC, et al. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using Pro Taper instruments: Value of the safety quotient. J Endod. 2003.
  44. Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper endodontic system: geometries, features, and guidelines for use. Dent Today. 2OOi;2o(io):6o-7.
  45. Flexmaster”. Brochure available at www.vdw-dental.com
  46. FKG Race. Brochure available at www.fkg.com
  47. Malagnino V, Grande N, Plotino G, et al. The simultaneous technique for root canal preparation with the Mtwo NiTi rotary system. Endodontic Practice. 2oo8;(5):2o-3i.
  48. Veltri M, Mollo A, Mantovani L, et al. A comparative study of Endoflare-Hero Shaper and Mtwo NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2005;38:610-6.
  49. Schafer E, Erler M, Dammaschke T. Comparative study on the shaping ability and cleaning efficiency of rotary Mtwo instruments. Int Endod J. 2006;39:203-12.
  50. Schafer H. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium FlexMaster" instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-FlexoFile". Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals. Int. Endod J. 2002.
  51. Kaval ME, Capar ID, Ertas H. Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties. J Endod. 2O16;42(12):i84O-3.
  52. Gagliardi J, Versiani MA, de Sou-sa-Neto MD, et al. Evaluation of the shaping characteristics of ProTaper Gold, ProTaper NEXT, and ProTaper* Universal in curved canals. J Endod. 2oi5;4i(io):i7i8-24.
  53. Vasconcelos GRA, Arias A, Peters OA. Lateral and axial cutting efficiency of instruments manufactured with conventional nickel-titanium and novel gold metallurgy. Int Endod J. 20О18;51(5):577-83.
  54. Pasqualini D, Bianchi CC, Cantatore G et al. Computed micro-tomographic evaluation of glide path with nickel-titanium rotary pathfile in maxillary first molars curved canals. J Endod. 2011;38(з):389-93.
  55. Pasqualini D, Mollo L, Scotti N, et al. Post-operative pain following manual and mechanical glide path: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2012;38(1):32-6.
  56. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of the mechanical behaviour of Path-File and ProGlider pathfinding nickel-titanium rotary instruments. Int Endod J. 2O15;48(9):894-9O1.
  57. Berutti Е, Alovisi М, Pastorelli МА, et al. Energy consumption of ProTaper Next Xi after Glide Path with PathFiles and ProGlider. J Endod. 2oi4;4o(i2):2oi5-8.
  58. Johnson E, Lloyd A, Kuttler S, et al. Comparison between a novel Nickel-Titani-um alloy and 508 nitinol on the cyclic fatigue life of ProFile 25/. 04 rotary instruments. J Endod. 2008;34(n):i406-9.
  59. Perez-Higueras JJ, Arias A, de la Ma-corra JC, et al. Differences in cyclic fatigue resistance between ProTaper Next and ProTaper' Universal instruments at different levels. J Endod. 2oi4;4o(9):i477-8i.
  60. Zhao D, Shen Y, Peng B, et al. Root canal preparation of mandibular molars with 3 Nickel-Titanium rotary instruments: A Micro-computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2O14;4o(h):i86o-4.
  61. Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, et al. ProFile Vortex instruments after clinical use: a metallurgical properties study. J Endod. 2012;38(12):61-5.
  62. Gao Y, Coil JM, Zhou HM, et al. Evaluation of the impact of raw materials on the fatigue and mechanical properties of ProFile vortex rotary instruments. J Endod. 2012;38(12):1613-7.
  63. Peters OA, Arias A, Paque F. A micro-computed tomographic assessment of root canal preparation with a novel instrument, TRUShape, in mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod. 2O15;41(9):1545-5O.
  64. Arias A, Paque F, Shyn S, et al. Effect of canal preparation with TRUShape and Vortex rotary instruments on three-dimensional geometry of oval root canals. Austr Endod J. 2O18;44(i):32-9.
  65. Gambarini G, Plotino G, Grande NM, et al. Mechanical properties of nickel-tita-nium rotary instruments produced with a new manufacturing technique. Int Endod J. 20ii;44(4):337-4i.
  66. Nicoll T, Oestreich L, Tang C, et al. Evaluation of product properties resulting from a new NiTi endodontic file manufacturingprocess. Chemical and Materials Engineering Depar”ent, California State Polytechnic University, 2006.
  67. Glassman G, Gambarini G, Rosler S. Twistedfiles and adaptive motion technology: a winning combination for safe and predictable root canal shaping. Roots 2016;3:14-20.
  68. FKG Dentaire SA Products.
  69. Sanabria-Liviac D, Moldauer BI, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. Comparison of the XP-Endo Finisher File System and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) on smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation effectiveness of two irrigation methods on smear layer removal. J Dent Oral Health 2017:4:101.
  70. Silva EJN, Belladonna FG, Zyolo AS, et al. Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher and XP-endo Finisher R in removing root filling remnants: a micro-CT study. Int Endod J. 2O18;51(l):86-91.
  71. Generali L, P Puddu P, Borghi A, et al. Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc' Blue and Reciproc'. Int Endod J. 2020;5з(2):250-б4.
  72. Topcjuoglu HS, Demirbuga S, Duzgun S, et al. Cyclic fatigue resistance of new reciprocating files (Reciproc' Blue, WaveOne' Gold, and SmartTrack) in two different curved canals. J Investig Clin Dent 2018;9(з):е12344. doi: io.iin/jicd.12344.
  73. Adiguzel M, Davut Capar I. Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of waveone and waveonegold small, primary, and large instruments. J Endod. 2017;4з(4):6гз-7.
  74. Ozyurek T. Cyclic fatigue resistance of reciproc, waveone, and waveone gold nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod. 2О16;42(ю):153б-9.
  75. Gluskin AH, Peters CI, Peters OA. Minimally invasive endodontics: challenging prevailing paradigms. Br Dent J. 2014; 2i6(6):347-53.
  76. Arora V, Yadav MP, Singh SP, et al. Comparative evaluation of post obturation materials on reinforcement of peri-cervical dentin (PCD) - an invit-ro study. International J Technology Enhancements and Emerging Engineering Research. 2015;з(ог):з9-45.
  77. Riyahi AM, Bashiri A, Alshahrni K, et al. Cyclic fatigue comparison ofTruN-atomy, Twisted File, and ProTaper Next Rotary Systems. Int J Dent 202, Feb 26. doi: 10.1155/2020/3190938.
  78. Webber J, Moser JB, Heuer MA. A method to determine the cutting efficiency of root canal instruments in linear motion. J Endod. 1980; 6: 829-34.
  79. Roth WC,Gough RW, Grandich RA, Walker WA. A study of the strength of endodontic files: Potential for torsional breakage and relative flexibility. J Endod. 1983; 9(6): 228-232.
  80. Schafer E. Tepel J. Relationship Between Design Features of Endodontic Instruments and Their Properties. Part 3. Resistance to Bending and Fracture. J Endod. 2001; 27(4):299-зоз.
  81. Schafer E. Relationship between design features of endodontic instruments and their properties. Part 2. Instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod. 1999; 25:56-9.

- Вернуться в оглавление раздела "Стоматология"

Редактор: Искандер Милевски. Дата публикации: 13.8.2024