Список трудов авторов, использованных при подготовке статей по реконструкции молочной железы после мастэктомии по поводу рака на сайте МедикалПланет

В статьях данного раздела сайта использованы следующие сокращения:

  • АДФ — аденозиндифосфат
  • АИХ — аменорея, индуцированная химиотерапией
  • ГнРГ — гонадотропин-рилизинг гормон
  • ГР — гомологичная рекомбинация
  • ДИ — доверительный интервал
  • ДНК — дезоксирибонуклеиновая кислота
  • ИА — ингибиторы ароматазы
  • ИМТ — индекс массы тела
  • иРМЖ — ипсилатеральный рак молочной железы
  • кРМЖ — контралатеральный рак молочной железы
  • КСЯ — контролируемая стимуляция яичников
  • мРНК — матричная рибонуклеиновая кислота
  • МРР — местно-регионарный рецидив
  • МРТ — магнитно-резонансная томография
  • ОР — относительный риск
  • ОСО — органосохраняющая операция
  • ПК — протоковая карцинома
  • ПМЛТ — постмастэктомическая лучевая терапия
  • ПНЯ — преждевременная недостаточность яичников
  • пПО — полный патоморфологический ответ
  • ПФЯ — подавление функций яичников
  • РМЖ — рак молочной железы
  • РНК — рибонуклеиновая кислота
  • тнРМЖ — тройной негативный рак молочной железы
  • УЗИ — ультразвуковое исследование ЭТ — эндокринная терапия
  • ADM (от англ, acellular dermal matrix) — бесклеточная кожная матрица
  • DRFI (от англ, distant recurrence-free interval) — выживаемость без отдаленных рецидивов
  • EORTC (от англ. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) — Европейская организация по исследованию и лечению рака
  • ER (от англ, estrogen receptor) — рецептор эстрогена
  • ESMO (от англ. European Society for Medical Oncology) — Европейское общество медицинской онкологии
  • HER (от англ, human epidermal growth factor receptor) — рецептор эпидермального фактора роста
  • IBCSG (от англ. International Breast Cancer Study Group) - Международная группа по изучению рака молочной железы
  • LD (от лат. latissimus dorsi) — широчайшая мышца спины
  • NCCN (от англ. National Comprehensive Cancer Network) — Национальная комплексная онкологическая сеть
  • РАМ50 (от англ, prediction analysis of the microarrays) — количественный анализ 50 генов с помощью полимеразной цепной реакции в режиме реального времени
  • PARP (от англ. poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerases) — поли-(АДФ-рибоза)-полимераза
  • PgR (от англ, progesterone receptor) — рецептор прогестерона
  • PI3K (от англ, phosphoinositide 3-kinase) — фосфоинозитид-3-киназа
  • ROR-PT (от англ, risk of recurrence score) — балл риска рецидива
  • SEER (от англ. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) — анализ течения, распространенности и исходов злокачественных новообразований

При подготовке статей по реконструкции молочной железы после мастэктомии по поводу рака на сайте МедикалПланет использованы труды исключительно признанных зарубежных авторов:

  1. Blondeel P.N. et al. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009. Vol. 123, N 2. P. 455-462.
  2. Blondeel P.N. et al. Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three-step principle. Part II - breast reconstruction after total mastectomy // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009. Vol. 123, N 3. P. 794-805.
  3. Ellsworth W.A. et al. Breast reconstruction in women under 30: a 10-year experience//Breast J. 2011. Vol. 17, N 1. P. 18-23.
  4. Cordeiro P.G. et al. Irradiation after immediate tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction: outcomes, complications, aesthetic results, and satisfaction among 156 patients // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2004. Vol. 113, N 3. P. 877-881.
  5. Cowen D. et al. Immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy: risk factors for complications // Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2010. Vol. 121, N3. P. 627-634.
  6. Brennan M.E., Spillane AJ. Uptake and predictors of post-mastectomy reconstruction in women with breast malignancy - systematic review // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013. Vol. 39, N 6. P. 527-541.
  7. Barry M., Kell M.R. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis // Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2011. Vol. 127, N 1. P. 15-22.
  8. Brennan М.Е. et al. Immediate expander/implant breast reconstruction followed by post-mastectomy radiotherapy for breast cancer: aesthetic, surgical, satisfaction and quality of life outcomes in women with high-risk breast cancer // Breast. 2016. Vol. 30. P. 59-65.
  9. Clarke-Pearson E.M. et al. Comparison of irradiated versus nonirradiated DIEP flaps in patients undergoing immediate bilateral DIEP reconstruction with unilateral postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) // Ann. Plast. Surg. 2013. Vol. 71, N 3. P. 250-254.
  10. Costa S.D. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy shows similar response in patients with inflammatory or locally advanced breast cancer when compared with operable breast cancer: a secondary analysis of the GeparTrio trial data //J. Clin. Oncol. 2010. Vol. 28, N 1. P. 83-91.
  11. Dawood S. et al. International expert panel on inflammatory breast cancer: consensus statement for standardized diagnosis and treatment // Ann. Oncol. 2011. Vol. 22, N3. P. 515-523.
  12. Patel S.A. et al. Immediate breast reconstruction for women having inflammatory breast cancer in the United States // Cancer Med. 2018. Vol. 7. P. 2887.
  13. Simpson A.B. et al. Immediate reconstruction in inflammatory breast cancer: challenging current care // Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016. Vol. 23, suppl. 5. P. 642-648.
  14. Chang D.W., Barnea Y, Robb G.L. Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008. Vol. 122, N 2. P. 356-362.
  15. Kronowitz SJ. Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction: technical and timing considerations // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010. Vol. 125, N 2. P. 463-474.
  16. Mennie J.C. et al. National trends in immediate and delayed post-mastectomy reconstruction procedures in England: a seven-year population-based cohort study // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 43, N 1. P. 52-61.
  17. Albornoz C.R. et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013. Vol. 131, N 1. P. 15-23.
  18. Cemal Y. et al. A paradigm shift in U.S. breast reconstruction: part 2. The influence of changing mastectomy patterns on reconstructive rate and method // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013. Vol. 131, N 3. P. 320e-326e.
  19. Salzberg C.A. et al. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm) // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011. Vol. 127, N 2. P. 514-524.
  20. Colwell A.S. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction // Gland Surg. 2012. Vol. 1, N3. P. 139-141.
  21. Colwell A.S. et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014. Vol. 133, N 3. P. 496-506.
  22. Pusic A.L., Cordeiro P.G. Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders and implants: a practical guide to immediate and delayed reconstruction // Semin. Plast. Surg. 2004. Vol. 18, N 2. P 71-77.
  23. Spear S.L. et al. Two-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction using AlloDerm including outcomes of different timings of radiotherapy // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012. Vol. 130, N 1. P. 1-9.
  24. Reitsamer R., Peintinger Е Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet Surg. 2015. Vol. 68, N 2. P. 162-167.
  25. Antony A.K. et al. Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010. Vol. 125, N 6. P. 1606-1614.
  26. Winters Z.E., Colwell A.S. Role of acellular dermal matrix-assisted implants in breast reconstruction // Br. J. Surg. 2014. Vol. 101, N 5. P. 444-445.
  27. Becker H., Zhadan O. Filling the Spectrum expander with air - a new alternative // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2017. Vol. 5, N 10. Article ID el541.
  28. Kim J.Y.S., Mlodinow A.S. What’s new in acellular dermal matrix and soft-tissue support for prosthetic breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2017. Vol. 140, N 5S. Advances in Breast Reconstruction. P. 30S-43S.
  29. Cheng A., Saint-Cyr M. Comparison of different ADM materials in breast surgery // Clin. Plast. Surg. 2012. Vol. 39, N 2. P. 167-175.
  30. Hinchcliff K.M. et al. Comparison of two cadaveric acellular dermal matrices for immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2017. Vol. 70, N 5. P. 568-576.
  31. Gschwantler-Kaulich D. et al. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - a prospective randomized trial // Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016. Vol. 42, N 5. P. 665-671.
  32. Cabalag M.S. et al. Alloplastic adjuncts in breast reconstruction // Gland Surg. 2016. Vol. 5, N2. P. 158-173.
  33. Macadam S.A., Lennox P.A. Acellular dermal matrices: use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery // Can. J. Plast. Surg. 2012. Vol. 20, N 2. P. 75-89.
  34. Jansen L.A., Macadam S.A. The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part I. A systematic review // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011. Vol. 127, N 6. P. 2232-2244.
  35. Kim J.Y. et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012. Vol. 129, N 1. P. 28-41.
  36. Hoppe I.C. et al. Complications following expander/ implant breast reconstruction utilizing acellular dermal matrix: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eplasty. 2011. Vol. ll.P. e40.
  37. Sbitany H., Serletti J.M. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011. Vol. 128, N 6. P. 1162-1169.
  38. Alamouti R., Hachach Haram N., Farhadi J. A novel grading system to assess donor site suitability in autologous breast reconstruction // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2015. Vol. 68, N 6. P. el29-e130.
  39. Delay E., Guerid S. The role of fat grafting in breast reconstruction // Clin. Plast. Surg. 2015. Vol. 42, N 3. P. 315-323. vii.
  40. Hitier M. et al. Tolerance and efficacy of lipomodelling as an element of breast symmetry in breast reconstruction // Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 2014. Vol. 59, N 5. P. 311-319.
  41. Delay Е., Delaporte Т, Sinna R. Breast implant alternatives // Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 2005. Vol. 50, N 5. P. 652-672.
  42. Delay E., Meruta A.C., Guerid S. Indications and controversies in total breast reconstruction with lipomodeling// Clin. Plast. Surg. 2018. Vol. 45, N 1. P. 111-117.
  43. Khouri R.K. et al. Aesthetic applications of Brava-assisted megavolume fat grafting to the breasts: a 9-year, 476-patient, multicenter experience // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014. Vol. 133, N 4. P. 796-807.
  44. Kosowski T.R., Rigotti G., Khouri R.K. Tissue-engineered autologous breast regeneration with Brava®-assisted fat grafting // Clin. Plast. Surg. 2015. Vol. 42, N 3. P. 325-337. viii
  45. Rigotti G. et al. Autologous fat grafting in breast cancer patients // Breast. 2012. Vol. 21, N5. P. 690.
  46. Schneider W.J., Hill H.L., Brown RG. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction // Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1977. Vol. 30, N 4. P. 277-281.
  47. Clough K.B., Kroll S.S., Audretsch W. An approach to the repair of partial mastectomy defects // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1999. Vol. 104, N 2. P. 409-420.
  48. Johns N. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction using the immediately lipofilled extended latissimus dorsi flap //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2018. Vol. 71, N2. P. 201-208.
  49. Mushin O.P., Myers P.L., Langstein H.N. Indications and controversies for complete and implant-enhanced latissimus dorsi breast reconstructions // Clin. Plast. Surg. 2018. Vol. 45, N 1. P. 75-81.
  50. Branford O.A. et al. Subfascial harvest of the extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction: a comparative analysis of two techniques // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2013. Vol. 132, N 4. P. 737-748.
  51. Hammond D.C. Latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009. Vol. 124, N 4. P. 1055-1063.
  52. Losken A. et al. Outcomes evaluation following bilateral breast reconstruction using latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps // Ann. Plast. Surg. 2010. Vol. 65, N 1. P. 17-22.
  53. Colohan S. et al. The free descending branch muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap: vascular anatomy and clinical applications // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2012. Vol. 130, N 6. P. 776e-787e.
  54. Bailey S.H. et al. The low transverse extended latissimus dorsi flap based on fat compartments of the back for breast reconstruction: anatomical study and clinical results // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011. Vol. 128, N 5. P. 382e-394e.
  55. Rusby J.E. et al. Immediate latissimus dorsi miniflap volume replacement for partial mastectomy: use of intra-operative frozen sections to confirm negative margins // Am. J. Surg. 2008. Vol. 196, N 4. P. 512-518.
  56. Thomsen J.B., Gunnarsson G.L. The evolving breast reconstruction: from latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap to a propeller thoracodorsal fasciocutaneous flap // Gland Surg. 2014. Vol. 3, N 3. P. 151-154.
  57. Santanelli F. et al. Total breast reconstruction using the thoracodorsal artery perforator flap without implant // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014. Vol. 133, N 2. P. 251-254.
  58. McCulley SJ. et al. Lateral thoracic artery perforator (LTAP) flap in partial breast reconstruction //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2015. Vol. 68, N 5. P. 686-691.
  59. Hamdi М. et al. The lateral intercostal artery perforators: anatomical study and clinical application in breast surgery // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2008. Vol. 121, N 2. P. 389-396.
  60. Millard D.R. Breast reconstruction after a radical mastectomy // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1976. Vol. 58, N 3. P. 283-291.
  61. Knox A.D. et al. Comparison of outcomes following autologous breast reconstruction using the DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a 12-year clinical retrospective study and literature review//Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016. Vol. 138, N l.P. 16-28.
  62. Jones G. The Pedicled TRAM flap in breast reconstruction // Breast Cancer / ed. U. Veronesi. New York : Springer, 2017. P. 465-483.
  63. Reid A.W. et al. An international comparison of reimbursement for DIEAP flap breast reconstruction //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2015. Vol. 68, N 11. P. 1529-1535.
  64. Erdmann-Sager J. et al. Complications and patient-reported outcomes after abdominal-based breast reconstruction: results of the mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) study // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2018. Vol. 141, N2. P. 271-281.
  65. Blondeel N. et al. The donor site morbidity of free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction // Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1997. Vol. 50, N 5. P. 322-330.
  66. Blondeel P.N. One hundred free DIEP flap breast reconstructions: a personal experience // Br. J. Plast. Surg. 1999. Vol. 52, N 2. P. 104-111.
  67. Krishnan N.M. et al. The cost effectiveness of the DIEP flap relative to the musclesparing TRAM flap in postmastectomy breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015. Vol. 135, N 4. P. 948-958.
  68. Granzow J.W. et al. Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2006. Vol. 59, N 6. P. 571-579.
  69. Roostaeian J. et al. The effect of prior abdominal surgery on abdominally based free flaps in breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014. Vol. 133, N 3. P. 247e-255e.
  70. Pennington D.G. The stacked DIEP flap // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011. Vol. 128, N 4. P. 377e-378e.
  71. DellaCroce F.J., Sullivan S.K., Trahan C. Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2011. Vol. 127, N 3. P. 1093-1099.
  72. Healy C., Allen RJ. The evolution of perforator flap breast reconstruction: twenty years after the first DIEP flap //J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2014. Vol. 30, N 2. P. 121-125.
  73. Rozen W.M. et al. The SIEA angiosome: interindividual variability predicted pre-operatively // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2009. Vol. 124, N 1. P. 327-328.
  74. LoTempio M.M., Allen R.J. Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010. Vol. 126, N 2. P. 393-401.
  75. Allen R.J., Levine J.L., Granzow J.W. The in-the-crease inferior gluteal artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2006. Vol. 118, N 2. P. 333-339.
  76. Hunter J.E. et al. Evolution from the TUG to PAP flap for breast reconstruction: comparison and refinements of technique //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2015. Vol. 68, N 7. P. 960-965.
  77. Bodin F. et al. The transverse musculo-cutaneous gracilis flap for breast reconstruction: how to avoid complications // Microsurgery. 2016. Vol. 36, N 1. P. 42-48.
  78. de Weerd L. ct al. Autologous breast reconstruction with a free lumbar artery perforator flap // Br. J. Plast. Surg. 2003. Vol. 56, N 2. P. 180-183.
  79. Hamdi M. et al. Lumbar artery perforator flap: an anatomical study using multidetector computed tomographic scan and surgical pearls for breast reconstruction // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016. Vol. 138, N 2. P. 343-352.
  80. Honart J.F. et al. Lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction // Ann. Chir. Plast. Esthet. 2018. Vol. 63, N 1. P. 25-30.
  81. Peters K.T. et al. Early experience with the free lumbar artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2015. Vol. 68, N 8. P. 1112-1119.
  82. Sommeling C.E. et al. Composite breast reconstruction: implant-based breast reconstruction with adjunctive lipofilling //J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2017. Vol. 70, N8. P. 1051-1058.
  83. Nava M.B., Catanuto G., Rocco N. Hybrid breast reconstruction // Minerva Chir. 2018. Vol. 73, N 3. P. 329-333.

- Вернуться в оглавление раздела "Стоматология"

Редактор: Искандер Милевски. Дата публикации: 11.12.2024